Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Judicial interventions and religious conflict in India

A constitutional critique from the Global South

Bibliographic Data

ID7172134
AuthorsJamal Uddin Choudhury (0000-0001-6843-0523, Department of Political Science, Patharkandi College, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume46
Issue17
Pages2262-2277
Publication date2025-11-22
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThird World Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0143-6597 • E-ISSN: 1360-2241
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01436597.2025.2559368
OpenAlexW4414520264
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited9

In India’s deeply pluralistic yet increasingly polarised socio-political landscape, the judiciary has emerged as a central arbiter in religious conflicts. This paper critically examines the constitutional role of the Indian judiciary in adjudicating high-profile religious disputes, including the Shah Bano, Ayodhya, Sabarimala and Triple Talaq cases. Drawing on doctrinal analysis and theories of legal constitutionalism and Indian secularism, the study interrogates how the courts have navigated competing claims of religious freedom, gender equality and state neutrality. It argues that the judiciary functions not merely as a legal interpreter but as a political institution mediating tensions between community sentiment and constitutional morality. While some verdicts have advanced rights-based jurisprudence, others reveal patterns of majoritarian accommodation, raising urgent questions about the limits of judicial intervention in managing communal conflict. The paper contends that the credibility and constitutional authority of the judiciary in a postcolonial democracy like India hinge on its ability to balance principled secularism with pluralistic legitimacy

Global South · Psychological intervention · Religious conflict · South asia · Third world · American Constitutional Law and Politics

  • The political (un)making of Indian secularism

    Open Access•Waseem Ahmad Bhat, Shazia Majid et al.•Journal of Asian and African…•2026

  • The great theft

    Khaled Abou El Fadl•The great theft•2005

  • Courts

    Martin Shapiro•Courts•1981

  • Constitutional Theocracy

    Open Access•Ran Hirschl•Constitutional Theocracy•2010

  • Comparative Law in a Global Context

    Open Access•Werner F Menski•Comparative Law in a Global Context•2006

  • The Transformative Constitution

    Open Access•Sandeep Suresh•International Journal of…•2020

  • Towards Juristocracy

    Open Access•Vlad Perju•Modern Law Review•2005

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae