Communication within archaeology
Do we understand each other
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7175309 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Natalie Venclová (0000-0002-5474-0261, Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Archaeology, Prague, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 207-222 |
| Publication date | 2007-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Archaeology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-9571 • E-ISSN: 1741-2722 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1461957108095985 |
| OpenAlex | W2136180679 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 12 |
Academic discourse has its own norms related to the national culture, but also to the academic community concerned. In a linguistic classification, discourse communities are being formed with their own conventions and their own academic languages, rhetoric and intellectual styles, sharing paradigms, goals and methods. A positive aspect of discourse communities is that they spread across different national languages and across different – mainstream and minor – communities (using the language of the leading group of researchers). Can this be seen in present-day archaeology, and can it bridge the gap in communication between mainstreams and minorities
Art · Bridge (graph theory · Humanities · Linguistics · Mainstream · Media studies · Minor (academic · Political science · Rhetoric · Sociology · Anthropology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · linguistics and terminology studies · Translation Studies and Practices
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,24 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2023 (15) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |