The Age and Context of the KC4 Maxilla, Kent's Cavern, UK
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7175686 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chris Proctor (0000-0003-3492-9590, Torquay Museum, corresponding author), Katerina Douka (0000-0002-0558-0011, University of Oxford), Janet W Proctor (Torbay Hospital), T F G Higham (0000-0002-5949-598X, University of Oxford), Tom Higham |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 74-97 |
| Publication date | 2017-01-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Archaeology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-9571 • E-ISSN: 1741-2722 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/eaa.2016.1 |
| OpenAlex | W2581851471 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 18 |
Kent's Cavern is one of Britain's most important Palaeolithic sites. The Torquay Natural History Society excavations in the Vestibule (1926–1928 and 1932–1938) yielded Middle and Early Upper Palaeolithic deposits as well as a fragment of human jaw (KC4). Higham et al. (2011) recently identified it as the oldest modern human fossil known from North West Europe, with a date estimated, using Bayesian modelling, at 44,200–41,500 cal bp (at 95.4% probability). However, White and Pettitt (2012) and Zilhão (2013) have claimed that the poor quality of the excavations and lack of stratigraphic integrity cast doubt on the archaeological and dating evidence from the site. Here, we present a thorough re-analysis of the excavations and show that they were in fact conducted to a reasonable standard. We also carefully examine the stratigraphic and sedimentological sequence and present twelve new AMS determinations from key contexts to test the previous model and chronology. We find that, while Trench C has good stratigraphic integrity, there is some evidence of post-depositional disruption of certain parts; some post-depositional movement is also shown by a limited number of artefact refits. There are two outlying AMS determinations dating to c. 32,000 bp . We therefore cannot exclude completely the possibility that the maxilla's age could be younger than the published probability distribution function (PDF). Our analysis lends support to the assessment by Higham et al. (2011) of the site and KC4 and shows that it offers considerable potential for future study
Archaeology · Chronology · Context (archaeology · Excavation · Geography · Sedimentary depositional environment · Sequence (biology · Stratigraphic unit · Structural basin · Tectonics · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology · Geology · Paleontology · Stratigraphy
The British Earlier Upper Palaeolithic
The earliest evidence for anatomically modern humans in northwestern Europe
Neandertal-Modern Human Contact in Western Eurasia
A critical review of the German Paleolithic hominin record
Note on Recent Excavations in Kents Cavern, Torquay
A Collection of Early Upper Palaeolithic Artefacts from Beedings, near Pulborough, West Sussex, and the Context of Similar Finds from the British Isles
IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0–50,000 Years cal BP
Bayesian Analysis of Radiocarbon Dates
Improvements to the Pretreatment of Bone at Oxford
AMS Radiocarbon Dating of Ancient Bone Using Ultrafiltration
Current Pretreatment Methods for AMS Radiocarbon Dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (Orau)
Discussion Reporting of 14 C Data
Radiocarbon Dates From the Oxford Ams System
Ancient Digs and Modern Myths
European Middle and Upper Palaeolithic radiocarbon dates are often older than they look
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,56 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |