Parenting Coordination in Spanish Jurisprudence (2012-2024)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7203101 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Asunción Tejedor-Huerta (0000-0002-5408-7709, Valencian International University, corresponding author), Nuria Vázquez-Orellana (0000-0002-3269-9077, Valencian International University), Macarena Tortosa-Pérez (Universidad Internacional), Macarena Tortosa (0000-0002-7900-4877, Valencian International University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 27-36 |
| Publication date | 2026-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Papeles del Psicólogo - Psychologist Papers (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0214-7823 • E-ISSN: 1886-1415 |
| Publisher | Spanish Psychological Association (Colegio Oficial de Psicólogos) (PUBLISHER • ES) |
| DOI | 10.70478/pap.psicol.2026.47.04 |
| OpenAlex | W7127915409 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 14 |
Parenting coordination emerged in the United States of America in the 1990s as a specialized intervention to manage high-conflict parental separations, with the goal of protecting children by reducing interparental disputes. This study analyzes its introduction in Spain through case law from 2012 to 2024. Of 883 judicial rulings identified, 389 were examined that approved or sustained parenting coordination. The highest number of cases occurred in Catalonia and the Valencian Community, followed by Madrid, Murcia, and Navarre. Courts rulings are based on the best interests of the child and the need to ensure compliance with judicial measures or parenting plans. Although not yet legally regulated in Spain, parenting coordination is supported by constitutional principles, the Civil Code, and international child protection standards. The findings reveal uneven implementation across regions, with greater prevalence in areas where specific services or projects exist. A consolidated body of jurisprudence—particularly in Catalonia—supports the legitimacy of parenting coordination. The study concludes with a recommendation for its formal legal regulation
Best interests · Child custody · Child protection · Compliance (psychology · Intervention (counseling · Jurisprudence · Legitimacy · Family and Matrimonial Law · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Reproductive Health and Technologies
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |