The Modern Study of Myth and Its Relation to Science

The history of the modern study of myth can be divided into two main categories: that which sees myth as the primitive counterpart to natural science, itself considered overwhelmingly modern, and that which sees myth as almost anything but the primitive counterpart to natural science. The first category constitutes the nineteenth‐century approach to myth. The second category constitutes the twentieth‐century approach. Tylor and Frazer epitomize the nineteenth‐century view. Malinowski, Eliade, Bultmann, Jonas, Camus, Freud, and Jung epitomize the twentieth‐century approach. The question for the twenty‐first century is whether myth can be brought back to the physical world, but in a way compatible with science. The case of the myth of Gaia will be considered as a possible way of doing so

Archaeology · Art · Art history · Epistemology · History of science · Literature · Mythology · Natural (archaeology · Relation (database · Classics · Computer Science · History · Humanities and Social Sciences · Philosophy · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life

• Jung's very twentieth‐century view of myth

  Open Access•Robert A Segal•Journal of Analytical Psychology•2003

  Add to list

• The Father in Primitive Psychology and Myth in Primitive Psychology

  Malinowski, Malinowski Malinowski•Father in Primitive Psychology…•2013

  Add to list