A Comment on Hybrid Fields and Academic Gate-Keeping
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7213216 |
|---|---|
| Authors | C Holtorf (0000-0002-0557-9651, Linnaeus University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 310-316 |
| Publication date | 2009-08-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Public Archaeology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1465-5187 • E-ISSN: 1753-5530 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1179/175355309x457303 |
| OpenAlex | W2041455536 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 5 |
The workshop on Poros which forms the basis of this collection of papers was entitled ‘Archaeological ethnographies: charting a fi eld, devising methodologies’. Both the workshop and the present volume that resulted from it constitute attempts to establish a new fi eld, with its own methodologies and its own contested practices, at the interface of several existing disciplines and fi elds of research. My comment takes the workshop on Poros and its results as a starting point but intends to raise some relevant wider issues concerning the dynamics of academic practice
Archaeological theory · Archaeology · Epistemology · Ethnography · Ontology · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology · Archaeological Research and Protection · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · History · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.31 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2023 (11) |
| Highly cited | No |