Dirty research
A Call Towards Decolonial Urban Knowledge Production
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7213495 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tanzil Shafique (0000-0002-6315-4539, University of Sheffield, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Pages | 502-515 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | City (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1360-4813 • E-ISSN: 1470-3629 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13604813.2024.2447687 |
| OpenAlex | W4406811127 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 14 |
| References cited | 24 |
The conventional view of research emphasizes the systematic investigation to produce knowledge with an objective undertone, often emanating a sense of purity of the research process/methods. However, this piece calls for a reexamination of urban knowledge production, particularly its processual aspects and the implications of conducting it in relation to urban communities, where I suggest this purity is fictitious. The enquiry here arises from a decolonial critique of tokenistic engagement in urban research and an ontological critique of knowledge production as a good in itself. Instead, the concept of Dirty research presented here positions knowledge production as an embedded process within the creation of new worlds through entwining theory and action. I argue that the ways we conduct research—and the actions (or inactions) of researchers—are intricately connected to structural injustices, epistemic violence, and the perpetuation of coloniality. The proposed framework illustrates how urban research can be approached differently by adopting an ethos of reciprocity that 1) ensures parity in the knowledge produced, 2) fosters the co-production of research inquiries, and 3) cultivates empathetic allyship. By focusing on these interlinked processes, Dirty research conceptually challenges extractivist paradigms in urban knowledge production and charts pathways towards decolonial urban futures.
Business · Economics · Knowledge management · Knowledge production · Production (economics · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Computer Science · Urban and Rural Development Challenges · Urban Planning and Governance
Urban informality revisited
Holding open the urban imagination
Co-production and informal settlement redevelopment
Speculation from below
Is resistance futile? Fuelling collective work in the face of AI
Decolonizing Planning Perspectives
Epistemic decolonization of urban and regional planning and its historiography
Towards an ‘Ethics of Evidence’
Shadows on the wall
Living heritage as shared knowledge
Upgrading public space in Cape Town
Advancing just climate adaptation in the global South
Socio-technical practices
Cannibal Salvage Expenditure
Radical housing
Beyond Allyship
Decolonising global health in 2021
A Cyborg Manifesto
Real Social Science
Being Alive
Storytelling otherwise
Alliances, allyship and activism
Problems of participation
Radical unknowability
Against Decolonisation
Photo‐response
After Method
Decolonising geographical knowledges
Decolonising International Relations
Decolonising the Curriculum
Decolonising (through) inclusive education
On Decolonisation and the University
Population Control in Primitive Groups
The Surrounds
Decolonizing Methodologies
| Unique citing works | 14 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 14 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |