Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Democracy despite voter ignorance

A Weberian reply to Somin and Friedman

Bibliographic Data

ID7276335
AuthorsDavid Ciepley (0000-0003-2620-0601, University of Chicago, corresponding author)
Year1999
Volume13
Issue1-2
Pages191-227
Publication date1999-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0891-3811 • E-ISSN: 1933-8007
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/08913819908443529
OpenAlexW2176192375
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited5

Ilya Somin finds in the public's ignorance of policy issues a reason to reduce the size and scope of government. But one cannot restrict the range of issues that may be raised in a democracy without it ceasing to be a democracy. Jeffrey Friedman argues that, since feedback on the quality of private goods is superior to feedback on the quality of public policies, “privatizing” public decisions might improve their quality. However, the quality of feedback depends upon the nature of the good, not who provides it; and the absence of reliable feedback on a good may actually justify government involvement, to correct information asymmetries. More fundamentally, voter ignorance of policy issues is a problem only if we assume that the point of democracy is to secure voter control of policy. Max Weber, however, advocated democracy as the best available mechanism for securing strong and responsible leadership

Control (management · Democracy · Economics · Epistemology · Government (linguistics · Ignorance · Ilya · Law and economics · Management · Microeconomics · Point (geometry · Political science · Politics · Public good · Quality (philosophy · Scope (computer science · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Public Administration

  • What's Good and Bad in Political Communication Research? Normative Standards for Evaluating Media and Citizen Performance

    Scott L Althau, Scott L Althaus•SAGE Handbook of Political…•2012

  • E se soubéssemos mais? Simulando os votos e as opiniões dos eleitores mais informados no Brasil

    Open Access•Alessandro Freire, Pedro Masson Sesconetto Souza et al.•Revista de Sociologia e Política•2018

  • Ignorance as a Starting Point

    Jeffrey Friedman•Critical Review•2007

  • Is the public's ignorance of politics trivial

    Stephen Earl Bennett•Critical Review•2003

  • Why the state was dropped in the first place

    David Ciepley•Critical Review•2000

  • Popper, Weber, and Hayek

    Jeffrey Friedman•Critical Review•2005

  • After democracy, bureaucracy? Rejoinder to Ciepley

    Jeffrey Friedman•Critical Review•2000

  • Democracy and voter ignorance revisited

    Ilya Somin•Critical Review•2000

  • Objectivity, Political Order, and Responsibility in Max Weber’s Thought

    Maurizio Ferrera•Critical Review•2018

  • Habermas vs. Weber on democracy

    Reihan Salam•Critical Review•2003

  • Democracy in America

    Alexis De Tocqueville, Alexis Charles Henri Maurice Clérel De Tocqueville et al.•The Two Narratives of Political…•2010

  • Public ignorance and democratic theory

    Jeffrey Friedman•Critical Review•1998

  • Voter ignorance and the democratic ideal

    Ilya Somin•Critical Review•1998

  • The Division of Labour in Society

    Open Access•George Simpson, Emile Durkheim et al.•Durkheim•1984

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0,38
Citation span2000 - 2018 (19)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae