From dialogue rights to property rights
Reply to Shearmur
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7276361 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Frank I Michelman (0000-0001-7330-1101, Harvard University Press, corresponding author), Frank Michelman |
| Year | 1990 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 133-143 |
| Publication date | 1990-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Critical Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0891-3811 • E-ISSN: 1933-8007 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08913819008459597 |
| OpenAlex | W2179936961 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 4 |
Jeremy Shearmur's consequentialist argument for universality in the distribution of individual “negative”; liberties claims that what is gained as a consequence of extending such liberties to the last hitherto excluded group is likely to outweigh what is lost by doing so. In trying to make such a claim convincing, does it help to notice that whoever is denied negative liberties is thereby impeded from contributing to social dialogue about the arts and ethics of human well‐being? Perhaps, but only on two conditions: First, we understand individual identities as intersubjectively constituted. Second, we pursue universality in the distribution of social requisites of dialogic competence beyond negative liberties
Civil liberties · Competence (human resources · Dialogic · Human rights · Law and economics · Negative liberty · Notice · Political science · Politics · Social rights · Sociology · Universality (dynamical systems · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Psychology · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1991 - 2014 (24) |
| Highly cited | No |