Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Organizational Principles of Online Political Discussion

A Relational Event Stream Model for Analysis of Web Forum Deliberation

Bibliographic Data

ID7295974
AuthorsHai Liang (0000-0003-1779-9552, Department of Media and Communication; City University of Hong Kong; Hong Kong, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume40
Issue4
Pages483-507
Publication date2014-06-30
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Communication Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0360-3989 • E-ISSN: 1468-2958
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hcre.12034
OpenAlexW1984991759
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited58

The structure of online political discussion has proven important to deliberative democracy. However, the organizational mechanisms of the structure receive little attention in scholarship. This study employed a random-effects relational event model to differentiate and examine the effects of a set of organizational principles in web forum discussions. By analyzing more than 175,000 forum replies, the study found that cross-ideological debate is an independent organizational mechanism even when accounting for the effects from common interests, opinion congruity, purely structural effects, and conversational norms. These findings differ from the selective exposure thesis and previous incidental claims of political disagreement. In addition, the findings indicate that endogenous mechanisms and opinion congruity could influence the tendency of cross-ideological debate to varying degrees

Deliberation · Deliberative democracy · Democracy · Epistemology · Event (particle physics · Ideology · Online discussion · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Scholarship · Set (abstract data type · Sociology · Computer Science · Law · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Capital and Networks · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Broadcast Versus Viral Spreading

    Open Access•Hai Liang•Journal of Communication•2018

  • Endogeneity and permeation in an organizational communication network

    Open Access•Ben Gibson, Blaine Hoffman et al.•Social Networks•2021

  • Separating the wheat from the chaff

    Open Access•Diana Karimova, Roger Leenders et al.•Social Networks•2023

  • Trading favors—Examining the temporal dynamics of reciprocity in congressional collaborations using relational event models

    Open Access•Laurence Brandenberger•Social Networks•2018

  • Unpacking the complexity of online incivility

    Open Access•Baiqi Li, Y Song et al.•Internet Research•2024

  • Step by step

    Open Access•Aaron Schecter, Andrew Pilny et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2017

  • Team Coordination in Uncertain Environments

    Open Access•Andrew Pilny, Melissa Dobosh et al.•Human Communication Research•2020

  • Social Network Analysis

    Open Access•Stanley Wasserman, Katherine Faust•Social Network Analysis•1994

  • Social-Psychological Influences on Opinion Expression in Face-to-Face and Computer-Mediated Communication

    Open Access•Shirley S Ho, Douglas M Mcleod•Communication Research•2008

  • Social Interaction and Contextual Influences On Political Participation

    Open Access•Jan E Leighley, Jan Leighley•American Politics Quarterly•1990

  • Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis.

    Larry V Hedges, Jack L Vevea•Psychological Methods•1998

  • The political blogosphere and the 2004 U.S. election

    Open Access•Lada A Adamic, Natalie Glance•Proceedings of the 3rd…•2005

  • Transitivity in Structural Models of Small Groups

    Open Access•P W Holland, Samuel Leinhardt•Comparative Group Studies•1971

  • An Exponential Family of Probability Distributions for Directed Graphs

    P W Holland, Samuel Leinhardt•Journal of the American…•1981

  • Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks

    Open Access•Albert-László Barabási, Richard Albert et al.•Science•1999

  • Stigma

    Erving Goffman•Stigma•2009

  • Interaction Ritual

    Erving Goffman, Joel Best•Interaction Ritual•2017

  • The Internet and Democratic Discourse

    Lincoln Dahlberg•Information Communication & Society•2001

  • Dynamic Debates

    Open Access•Sarita Yardi, Drick Boyd et al.•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2010

  • Online Groups and Political Discourse

    Open Access•Magdalena Wojcieszak, Magdalena E Wojcieszak et al.•Journal of Communication•2009

  • Encountering “Difference” in the Contemporary Public Sphere

    Open Access•Jennifer Brundidge•Journal of Communication•2010

  • Beyond Deliberation

    Open Access•W P Eveland, Alyssa C Morey et al.•Journal of Communication•2011

  • Politically Motivated Reinforcement Seeking

    Open Access•R Kelly Garrett•Journal of Communication•2009

  • Perceived Versus Actual Disagreement

    Open Access•Magdalena Wojcieszak, Magdalena E Wojcieszak et al.•Journal of Communication•2012

  • Hearing the Other Side

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•Hearing the Other Side•2006

  • Public Deliberation, Discursive Participation, and Citizen Engagement

    Michael X Delli Carpini, Fay Lomax Cook et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2004

  • Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication

    Open Access•Deen Freelon, Deen G Freelon•New Media & Society•2010

  • Government-run Online Discussion Fora

    Open Access•Scott Wright•The British Journal of Politics…•2006

  • Diversity of Political Conversation on the Internet

    Open Access•Jennifer Stromer‐galley•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2006

  • Selective Posting

    Open Access•Gi Woong Yun, Sung‐yeon Park•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2011

  • Birds of a Feather Tweet Together

    Open Access•Itai Himelboim, Stephen McCreery et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2013

  • Normative and Informational Influences in Online Political Discussions

    Open Access•Vincent Price, Lilach Nir et al.•Communication Theory•2006

  • How Messages Affect Their Senders

    Open Access•Raymond J Pingree•Communication Theory•2007

  • Cross-ideological discussions among conservative and liberal bloggers

    Open Access•Eszter Hargittai, Jason Gallo et al.•Public Choice•2007

  • Initial Interaction Between Strangers and Acquaintances a Multivariate Analysis of Factors Affecting Choice of Communication Partners

    Open Access•Richard E Sykes•Human Communication Research•1983

  • De‐individuation and group polarization in computer‐mediated communication

    Open Access•Russell Spears, Martin Lea et al.•British Journal of Social…•1990

  • Clustering and Structural Balance in Graphs

    Open Access•James A Davis•Human Relations•1967

  • Deindividuation Effects on Group Polarization in Computer-Mediated Communication

    Open Access•E J Lee, Eun-Ju Lee•Journal of Communication•2006

  • Creating a Democratic Public Sphere Through Political Discussion

    Open Access•Steven M Schneider•Social Science Computer Review•1996

  • Democracy online

    Open Access•Zizi Papacharissi•New Media & Society•2004

  • Predicting Deliberative Conversation

    Patricia Moy, John Gastil•Political Communication•2006

  • Clustering and Hierarchy in Interpersonal Relations

    James A Davis•American Sociological Review•1970

  • Friends, Brokers, and Transitivity

    Open Access•Daniel Carpenter, Daniel P Carpenter et al.•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse

    Diana C Mutz, Jeffery J Mondak•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Public Beliefs About the Beliefs of the Public

    James M Fields, Howard Schuman•Public Opinion Quarterly•1976

  • News, Talk, Opinion, Participation

    Joohan Kim, Robert O Wyatt et al.•Political Communication•1999

  • A Relational Event Framework for Social Action

    Open Access•C T Butts•Sociological Methodology•2008

  • Virtual democratic dialogue? Bringing together citizens and politicians

    Jakob Linaa Jensen•Information Polity•2003

  • Does Deliberative Democracy Work

    David Ryfe, David M Ryfe•Annual Review of Political Science•2005

  • Homophily-Heterophily

    Everett M Rogers, Dilip Kumar Bhowmik•Public Opinion Quarterly•1970

  • Facilitating Communication across Lines of Political Difference

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•American Political Science Review•2001

  • Overlapping talk and the organization of turn-taking for conversation

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff•Language in Society•2000

  • Populist Politics, Communications Media and Large Scale Societal Integration

    Craig Calhoun•Sociological Theory•1988

  • Participation Shifts

    Des R Gibson, D R Gibson•Social Forces•2003

  • Models of Turn Taking in Conversational Interaction

    Open Access•Thomas P Wilson, John M Wiemann et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•1984

  • Beyond and Below Racial Homophily

    Andreas Wimmer, K Lewis•American Journal of Sociology•2010

  • Origins of Homophily in an Evolving Social Network

    Gueorgi Kossinets, Duncan J Watts•American Journal of Sociology•2009

  • Taking Turns and Talking Ties

    Des R Gibson, David R Gibson•American Journal of Sociology•2005

Citations per year0.78
Citation span2017 - 2024 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae