Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Response from Daniel Shapiro

Bibliographic Data

ID7298756
AuthorsDaniel Shapiro (0009-0003-9930-8653), Daniel J Shapiro (0000-0001-9429-1053, ISI Foundation, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume14
Issue2
Pages162-164
Publication date2007-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Cultural Property (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0940-7391 • E-ISSN: 1465-7317
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0940739107070166
OpenAlexW1989369673
LanguageEN

Audi confronts what troubles many: the repetitive, stagnant nature of cultural property debates. Restitution certainly falls into this mold. So do other topics. He is also right that the debate is barely legal, carried on more in the press and media than in the courts. He is equally insightful that the Elgin Marbles play an inordinate role in these debates, and often set the framework for discussion even when not directly noted. What is unclear is whether calling attention to the debate as counter-balanced argument-bites will get beyond the constraints of past thinking and formulaic argument

Argument (complex analysis · Cultural heritage · Cultural property · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Property (philosophy · Restitution · Set (abstract data type · Sociology · Archaeological Research and Protection · Computer Science · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · History · Law · Philosophy

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae