Response from Daniel Shapiro
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7298756 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Shapiro (0009-0003-9930-8653), Daniel J Shapiro (0000-0001-9429-1053, ISI Foundation, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 162-164 |
| Publication date | 2007-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Cultural Property (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0940-7391 • E-ISSN: 1465-7317 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0940739107070166 |
| OpenAlex | W1989369673 |
| Language | EN |
Audi confronts what troubles many: the repetitive, stagnant nature of cultural property debates. Restitution certainly falls into this mold. So do other topics. He is also right that the debate is barely legal, carried on more in the press and media than in the courts. He is equally insightful that the Elgin Marbles play an inordinate role in these debates, and often set the framework for discussion even when not directly noted. What is unclear is whether calling attention to the debate as counter-balanced argument-bites will get beyond the constraints of past thinking and formulaic argument
Argument (complex analysis · Cultural heritage · Cultural property · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Property (philosophy · Restitution · Set (abstract data type · Sociology · Archaeological Research and Protection · Computer Science · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · History · Law · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |