The Staffing of the United Nations Secretariat
A Continuing Discussion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7300851 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Henri Reymond (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1967 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 751-767 |
| Publication date | 1967-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Organization (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-8183 • E-ISSN: 1531-5088 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0020818300013357 |
| OpenAlex | W1998582143 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 1 |
The Fifth (Administrative and Budgetary) Committee of the General Assembly has always devoted a considerable amount of time and attention to the problem of the tenure of appointment in the Secretariat of the United Nations. At the 21st (1966) session, however, it went deeper than usual into the question whether and to what extent the international civil service should continue to be organized on a career basis. More specifically, it discussed the ratio of career as compared with noncareer appointments. In the debate the Western countries followed their habitual course: They upheld the career principle and opposed any extension of the practice of using permanent positions for temporary appointments. The Eastern European group similarly took its traditional line against the career system. The Afro-Asian delegates for their part were as usual mainly concerned with pushing their claims for a greater share of posts in the Secretariat; to that end they pressed for an increasing number of fixed-term appointments
Business · Civil service · Economics · Economy · General assembly · Political science · Service (business · Session (web analytics · Staffing · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Law · Public Administration
| Citations per year | 0.04 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1969 - 2014 (46) |
| Highly cited | No |