When morality policies meet governance

Private Governance as Response to Value-Driven Conflicts

Bibliographic Data

ID7322959
AuthorsEva-Maria Euchner (0000-0002-4928-9023, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Caroline Preidel (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München)
Year2016
Volume38
Issue1
Pages57-81
Publication date2016-12-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Public Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0143-814X • E-ISSN: 1469-7815
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0143814x16000222
OpenAlexW2566468725
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited49

Scholars of morality policy change primarily analyse state regulation. Through this narrow focus, they ignore private actors and their varying engagement across time and policies. We contribute to this research gap by comparing and explaining private actors’ involvement in euthanasia and prostitution policy in Germany. We argue that the extent of private engagement is determined by the private actors’ capacity to govern, governmental decision-making barriers and private actors’ interests. Thus, the present study makes an empirical contribution to the literature on private governance by exploring largely disregarded policy issues that are least-likely cases for the delegation of public regulatory competence. Furthermore, it adds to the morality policy literature in a theoretical way by showing that policy change in this field is not only a question of scope, timing and direction but also one of the types of governing actors

Competence (human resources · Corporate governance · Delegation · Economics · Empirical research · Management · Morality · Political science · Public economics · Public policy · Value (mathematics · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration