Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

New Approaches to Commentary Formation in Ancient Mesopotamia

Bibliographic Data

ID7325330
AuthorsZachary Wainer (Hebrew University of Jerusalem, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume140
Issue1
Publication date2020-04-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the American Oriental Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0279 • E-ISSN: 2169-2289
PublisherAmerican Oriental Society (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.7817/jameroriesoci.140.1.0143
OpenAlexW3019623308
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited11

Assyriologists who have studied Mesopotamian commentary formation have drawn upon ideas from scholars of religion in treating the creation of a static canon at the end of the second millennium bce as a necessary precondition for the emergence of cuneiform commentaries. The present contribution argues against the idea that Mesopotamian commentaries emerged in response to a closed canon by marshaling evidence from Mesopotamian divinatory compositions, including the celestial-divinatory series Enūma Anu Enlil and its associated aḫû, or “extraneous” tradition, as well as the extispical treatise Bārûtu. These compositions illustrate that commentaries could be written about texts that were still fluid and malleable in ancient Mesopotamia. Moreover, a brief look at the phenomenon of inner biblical exegesis in the Hebrew Bible supports the idea that texts need not be unchanging to be the subject of interpretation, whether in ancient Mesopotamia or elsewhere. In response to these conclusions, I outline an alternate theory for Mesopotamian commentary formation that eschews the importance of a closed canon and stresses instead ideas of scholarly bilingualism, divination, authority, and textual decorum in ancient Iraq

Ancient history · Art · Assyria · Biblical studies · Canon · Deuteronomist · Divination · Epistemology · Exegesis · Hebrew Bible · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Literature · Mesopotamia · Phenomenon · Ancient Near East History · Classics · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Linguistics and language evolution · Philosophy

  • Commentaries from ancient mesopotamia

    Open Access•Uri Gabbay•Religion Compass•2022

  • Prolegomena to the History of Israel

    Open Access•Julius Wellhausen, William Robertson Smith et al.•Prolegomena to the History of…•2013

  • Multilingualism and Formulations of Scholarship

    C Jay Crisostomo•Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und…•2016

  • Die nach Zeichen geordneten sumerisch-akkadischen Vokabulare

    H S Schuster•Zeitschrift für Assyriologie und…•1938

  • The Nimrud Catalogue of Medical and Physiognomical Omina

    J V Kinnier Wilson•Iraq•1962

  • A Catalogue of Texts and Authors

    W G Lambert•Journal of Cuneiform Studies•1962

  • Canonicity in Cuneiform Texts

    Francesca Rochberg-Halton•Journal of Cuneiform Studies•1984

  • TIN.TIR = Babylon, the Question of Canonization and the Production of Meaning

    Niek Veldhuis•Journal of Cuneiform Studies•1998

  • Ancestors, Authors, and Canonicity

    W G Lambert•Journal of Cuneiform Studies•1957

  • Astrological Reports to Assyrian Kings

    Marvin A Powell, Hermann Hunger•Journal of the American Oriental…•1995

  • Individual Prayer in Sumerian

    William W Hallo•Journal of the American Oriental…•1968

  • Babylonisch-Assyrische Diagnostik

    Jo Ann Scurlock, Nils P Heessel•Journal of the American Oriental…•2003

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae