Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Executive Branch Socialization and Deference on the U.S. Supreme Court

Bibliographic Data

ID7328680
AuthorsRob Robinson (0000-0001-6509-793X, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume46
Issue4
Pages889-921
Publication date2012-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw & Society Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0023-9216 • E-ISSN: 1540-5893
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00520.x
OpenAlexW2323792946
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited42

Are Supreme Court justices with prior experience in the executive branch more likely to defer to the president in separation of powers cases? While previous research has suggested that such background may signal judicial policy preferences but does not shape them, I argue here that institutional socialization may indeed increase future judicial deference to the president. Using an original data set of executive power cases decided between 1942 and 2007, I model justice-votes to test this hypothesis. I uncover three noteworthy findings: (1) a clear correlation between prior executive branch experience and support for the executive branch, (2) the degree of this support intensifies as executive branch tenure increases, a finding congruent with a socialization hypothesis, and (3) contrary to received wisdom, executive powers cases possess a clear ideological dimension, in line with the expectations of the attitudinal model

Deference · Executive branch · Executive power · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Socialization · Supreme court · Test (biology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • U.S. District Court Judicial Diversity

    Open Access•Matthew S Crow, Natalie Goulette•Crime & Delinquency•2025

  • Lacking Legislative Experience

    Open Access•Rob Robinson•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Challenging the State? Lawyers and the Reformed Administrative Appeals System in Japan

    Open Access•Rieko Kage•Law & Social Inquiry•2025

  • Understanding Curtiss-Wright

    Open Access•Edward A Purcell•Law and History Review•2013

  • Is the US Supreme Court a reliable backstop for an overreaching US president? Maybe, but is an overreaching (partisan) court worse

    Open Access•Rebecca L Brown, Lee Epstein•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2023

  • Adjudicating Executive Privilege

    Open Access•Gbemende Johnson, Gbemende E Johnson•Law & Society Review•2019

  • Vou indicar quem toma cerveja comigo

    Open Access•Lucas Magalhães, Mateus Morais Araújo et al.•Política & Sociedade•2023

  • Judges and Their Audiences

    Lawrence Baum•Judges and Their Audiences•2009

  • The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Harold J Spaeth•Supreme Court and the Attitudinal…•2002

  • Organizational socialization

    Georgia T Chao, Anne M O’Leary-Kelly et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•1994

  • Computing Interaction Effects and Standard Errors in Logit and Probit Models

    Open Access•Edward C Norton, Hua Wang et al.•The Stata Journal: Promoting…•2004

  • The Judicial Common Space

    Lee Epstein, A D Martins et al.•The Journal of Law Economics and…•2007

  • Clarify

    Open Access•Michael Tomz, Jason Wittenberg et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2003

  • Changes in newcomers' psychological contracts during organizational socialization

    Open Access•Helena Thomas-Currás, Helena D C Thomas et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•1998

  • Representative Bureaucracy and Policy Preferences

    Kenneth J Meier, Lloyd G Nigro•Public Administration Review•1976

  • Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

    Open Access•C Neal Tate•American Political Science Review•1981

  • Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices Revisited

    Jeffrey A Segal, Lee Epstein et al.•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • Explaining the Overruling of U.S. Supreme Court Precedent

    James F Spriggs, James F Spriggs James F Spriggs et al.•The Journal of Politics•2001

  • Explaining Executive Success in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Kevin T Mcguire•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999

    Open Access•A D Martins, Andrew D Martin et al.•Political Analysis•2002

  • U.S. Supreme Court Decision Making, Case Salience, and the Attitudinal Model

    Open Access•Isaac Unah, Ange-Marie Hancock et al.•Law & Policy•2006

  • Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Gregory A Caldeira, John Wright et al.•American Political Science Review•1988

  • Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Michael A Bailey, Forrest Maltzman•American Political Science Review•2008

  • The Least Dangerous Branch Revisited

    Kevin T Mcguire, James A Stimson•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Ducking Trouble

    Anna Harvey, Barry Friedman•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Federal District Judges and Presidential Power During the Postwar Era

    Craig R Ducat, Robert L Dudley•The Journal of Politics•1989

  • Models of State High Court Decision Making in Sex Discrimination Cases

    Gerard S Gryski, Eleanor C Main et al.•The Journal of Politics•1986

  • The Consistency of Judicial Choice

    Perry Mcd Collins, Paul M Collins•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • The Diversification of the Federal Bench

    Thomas G Walker, Tom Walker et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Guess What Happened on the Way to Revolution? Precursors to the Supreme Court's Federalism Revolution

    Cornell W Clayton, Jenny Pickerill et al.•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2004

  • Presidential Power and the United States Supreme Court

    Open Access•Jeff Yates, Andrew Whitford et al.•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Buyer Beware? Presidential Success through Supreme Court Appointments

    Jeffrey A Segal, Richard J Timpone et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2000

  • Bureaucrats, Policy Attitudes, and Political Behavior

    James Garand, Catherine T Parkhurst et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•1991

  • Do Black Judges Make a Difference

    Susan Welch, Michael W Combs et al.•American Journal of Political…•1988

  • Measuring Issue Salience

    Lee Epstein, Jeffrey A Segal•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, Lee Epstein et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916-88

    C Neal Tate, Roger Handberg•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • Black Elite Decision Making

    Thomas M Uhlman•American Journal of Political…•1978

  • Social Background as an Indicator to the Votes of Supreme Court Justices in Criminal Cases

    Sidney Ulmer, S Sidney Ulmer•American Journal of Political…•1973

  • The Sentencing Decisions of Black and White Judges

    Open Access•Cassia Spohn•Law & Society Review•1990

  • Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General during the Warren and Burger Courts

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal•The Western Political Quarterly•1988

  • Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal•American Political Science Review•1997

  • Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making

    Open Access•Mark J Richards, Herbert M Kritzer•American Political Science Review•2002

  • Networks in Context

    Open Access•Robert Huckfeldt, John Sprague•American Political Science Review•1987

  • Effects of Public Opinion on Policy

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page, Robert Y Shapiro•American Political Science Review•1983

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,54
Citation span2013 - 2025 (13)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae