Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Responsiveness of the U. S. Congressional Armed Services Committees to Their Parent Bodies

Bibliographic Data

ID7329412
AuthorsBruce A Ray (corresponding author)
Year1980
Volume5
Issue4
Pages501-501
Publication date1980-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/439571
OpenAlexW2324457831
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited2

The U.S. House and Senate Armed Services Committees are traditionally assumed to be more supportive of the military industrial complex than the Congress as a whole. This analysis provides evidence that this assumption is correct and further reveals that these panels also are not responsive to changes in congressional sentiments toward the complex. Biased committee recruitment patterns may be sufficient to explain this phenomenon in the House. Armed Services fills vacancies primarily with those already more committed than their colleagues to a strong national security posture. This, however, is not the case in the Senate, where those recruited for the assignment are fairly representative of their colleagues. Here these members undergo post-assignment conversions to positions more supportive of the military industrial complex

Political science · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Military History and Strategy · Public Administration

  • The committee outlier debate

    Open Access•Tim Groseclose•Public Choice•1994

  • In defense of the lowly scorecard

    Open Access•Daniel E Chand, William D Schreckhise et al.•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2014

  • Presidential Success in the Realm of Foreign Affairs

    Open Access•Bryan W Marshall•Social Science Quarterly•2003

  • Meeting Competing Demands

    Forrest Maltzman•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • The Ratification Premium

    Open Access•Sarah E Krep, Sarah E Kreps et al.•World Politics•2018

  • The Policy Impact of the Committee Assignment Process in the House

    Timothy E Cook•The Journal of Politics•1983

  • Testing Committee Composition Hypotheses for the U.S. Congress

    Tim Groseclose•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • Artificial Extremism in Interest Group Ratings

    Open Access•Jane Mcintosh Snyder, James M Snyder•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1992

  • Giving the People What They Want? The Distribution of Earmarks in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Deference, Extremism, and Interest Group Ratings

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1994

  • Party Effects in State Legislative Committees

    Open Access•Robert J Mcgrath, James M Ryan et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2019

  • The dynamics of committee outliers

    Robert D Brown, Jennifer M Erickson et al.•Journal of Legislative Studies•1997

  • Ousting the Oligarchs

    Leroy N Rieselbach, Joseph K Unekis•Congress & the Presidency•1981

  • The Pendulum of Congressional Power

    Bryan W Marshall, Baukje Prins et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2002

  • Are Congressional Committees Composed of Preference Outliers

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel•American Political Science Review•1990

  • Representation and Congressional Committees

    Open Access•Roger H Davidson, Roger Davidson•The Annals of the American…•1974

Unique citing works15
Citations per year0,33
Citation span1981 - 2019 (39)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 15

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae