Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Empire and Representation

The U. S. Congress

Bibliographic Data

ID7329474
AuthorsAbraham Holtzman (corresponding author)
Year1986
Volume11
Issue2
Pages249-249
Publication date1986-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/439878
OpenAlexW2332107257
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited3

A special system of representation in the House of Representatives has been created by Congress for the territorial units of the U.S. empire and for the federal district. This article examines the development of this unique system of imperial representation and compares its statutory representatives with the constitutional representatives elected from the states. An analysis of the floor behavior of contemporary members from both sets of legislators reveals that the statutory representatives are significantly more concerned with constituency. Although still operating under the original prohibition against their voting in the House, the statutory members participate otherwise nearly as equals with the constitutional members in decision making on the floor. Today they are also complete equals in voting power and privileges in the committees. In January 1985, the freshman class of Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives chose as their president a delegate to the House, Vicente Tomas Blaz, from the territory of Guam. A precedent-shattering decision on their part, it highlighted the existence of a unique type of legislator in the House, the extraconstitutional or statutory representative. It also marked the further integration of these special congressmen into the institutional character of that chamber. Delegate Blaz constitutes a strange anomaly in the House of Representatives: one of its members, but not a member; a representative, but not

Empire · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Representation (politics · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law

  • No One Thinks of Greenland

    Open Access•Ingo Heidbrink•American Studies in Scandinavia•2022

  • Representation on the Periphery

    Elliot Mamet•American Political Thought•2021

  • Democratic Equality for Washington, D.C

    Open Access•Elliot Mamet•Perspectives on Politics•2025

  • From Rules to Representation

    Jennifer Lewallen•PS Political Science & Politics•2017

  • American Studies in Scandinavia 54

    Open Access•Edited By Clara Juncker And Marianne Kongerslev•American Studies in Scandinavia•2022

  • Do Reserved Seats Work? Evidence from Tribal Representatives in Maine

    Open Access•Cameron Dehart, Elliot Mamet•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2023

  • Race, Democracy, and Empire

    Elliot Mamet, Austin Bussing•Polity•2024

  • Use of ‘Dear Colleague’ Letters in the US House of Representatives

    Jacob R Straus•Journal of Legislative Studies•2013

  • La accesibilidad a los servicios públicos desde la representación política

    Open Access•Mónica María Lara Escalante, Khemvirg Puente Martínez•Estudios Políticos (Medellín)•2024

  • Home Style

    Richard F Fenno•Home Style•1978

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • Circular Letters of Congressmen to Their Constituents, 1789-1829

    Ronald P Formisano, Noble E Cunningham et al.•The William and Mary Quarterly•1979

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,69
Citation span2013 - 2025 (13)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae