Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Challenger Quality and Voting Behavior in U. S. Senate Elections

Bibliographic Data

ID7329508
AuthorsPeverill Squire (0000-0003-4718-8226, corresponding author)
Year1992
Volume17
Issue2
Pages247-247
Publication date1992-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.2307/440060
OpenAlexW2314645416
LanguageEN
Citations received49
References cited8

A number of aggregate-level studies find that challenger quality is an important variable in explaining congressional election outcomes. Using the National Election Studies' 1988 Senate Election Study, I provide individual-level evidence supporting this claim. I develop and test measures of two aspects of challenger quality, one based on political experience and the other on campaign skills. Senate challengers who hold higher profile offices and those who are good campaigners are better known and better liked by voters and are much more likely to get votes, even with partisanship and campaign spending controlled. The findings reaffirm that candidates and campaigns matter in explaining election outcomes

Political science · Politics · Quality (philosophy · Voting · Voting behavior · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Public Administration

  • Partisan Bonds

    Open Access•Jeffrey D Grynaviski•Partisan Bonds•2010

  • Issue Politics in Congress

    Open Access•Tracy Sulkin•Issue politics in Congress•2005

  • Conditioning Factors for Re-election and Incumbency Advantage after a Natural Disaster

    Andrés A Acuña-Duarte, César Salazar et al.•The Journal of Development Studies•2021

  • Ballot Access, Vlast’ Dominance, and Pomoshchnik Political Culture in Russia’s Subnational Executive Elections

    Daniel Epstein•Region Regional Studies of Russia…•2014

  • Inexperienced or anti-establishment? Voter preferences for outsider congressional candidates

    Open Access•Eric R Hansen, Sarah A Treul•Research & Politics•2021

  • Staying Alive

    Open Access•Fei Shen•The International Journal of…•2008

  • Candidate Faces and Election Outcomes

    Matthew Atkinson, Ryan D Enos et al.•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2009

  • Do Quality Candidates and Incumbents Still Matter in the Partisan World? Comparing Trends and Relationship Between Candidate Differentials and Congressional Election Outcomes, 1900–2022

    C Algara, Byengseon Bae•Journal of Political Marketing•2024

  • Explaining the conflicting behavior of inexperienced and experienced political elites

    Open Access•Lisa J Carlson, Raymond Dacey•Conflict Management and Peace…•2023

  • The Electoral Glass Ceiling

    Martha Kropf, Martha E Kropf et al.•Women & Politics•2001

  • Tweeting to be a constitution-writer in Chile

    Open Access•Andrés A Acuña-Duarte, Pedro G Campos et al.•Technology in Society•2024

  • Sequential Choices and Partisan Transitions in U.S. Senate Delegations

    Gary M Segura, Stephen P Nicholson•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • Party Control of Party Primaries

    Hans J G Hassell•The Journal of Politics•2016

  • Candidates Matter

    Matthew K Buttice, Walter J Stone•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • The Redistricting Cycle and Strategic Candidate Decisions in U.S. House Races

    Marc J Hetherington, Bruce A Larson et al.•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • The Importance of Issues in Senate Campaigns

    Open Access•Kim Fridkin Kahn, Patrick J Kenney•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2001

  • And keep your enemies closer

    Open Access•Santiago Olivella, Kristin Kanthak et al.•Electoral Studies•2017

  • Chasing Fool’s Gold? Converting U.S. Senate Appointments into Election

    Timothy Lynch•Congress & the Presidency•2019

  • Temp to Perm

    Timothy Lynch•Congress & the Presidency•2017

  • Tempus Fugit, Incumbency Stays

    Rodrigo Praino, Daniel Stockemer•Congress & the Presidency•2012

  • Effectiveness of Negative Campaigning in U.S. Senate Elections

    Richard R Lau, Gerald M Pomper•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • Constituency Congruency and Candidate Competition in Primary Elections for the U.S. House

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Michael H Crespin et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2012

  • The Legislative Matching Game

    Open Access•Clint S Swift•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2019

  • Red Scare? Revisiting Joe McCarthy’s Influence on 1950s Elections

    Adam J Berinsky, Gabriel S Lenz•Public Opinion Quarterly•2014

  • Racial Salience, Viability, and the Wilder Effect

    Christopher Stout, Christopher T Stout et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2015

  • Veto Override Requirements and Executive Success

    Open Access•Robert J Mcgrath, Jon C Rogowski et al.•Political Science Research and…•2018

  • Challenger Quality in State Legislative Elections

    Emily Van Dunk•Political Research Quarterly•1997

  • Incumbency and Short-Term Influences on Voters

    Open Access•John R Petrocik, Scott W Desposato et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • Unequal Resources, Unequal Careers

    Open Access•Agustín Vallejo•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Midterm Elections and Divided Government

    Open Access•Stephen P Nicholson, Gary M Segura•Political Research Quarterly•1999

  • The Constrained Governor

    Open Access•Christopher A Cooper, H Gibbs Knotts et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  • Comparing Gubernatorial and Senatorial Elections

    Peverill Squire, Christina Fastnow•Political Research Quarterly•1994

  • Good Money and Bad Money

    Open Access•Brad Alexander•Political Research Quarterly•2005

  • The Impact of Ethics Laws on Legislative Recruitment and the Occupational Composition of State Legislatures

    Open Access•Beth Rosenson, Beth A Rosenson•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • Running Backwards and in High Heels

    Open Access•Sarah A Fulton•Political Research Quarterly•2012

  • Candidates, Money, and Voters-Assessing the State of Congressional Elections Research

    Open Access•Peverill Squire•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • Why Do Experienced Challengers Do Better than Amateurs

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus•Political Behavior•2008

  • Incumbent Vulnerability and Challenger Emergence in Senate Elections

    Open Access•Greg D Adams, Peverill Squire•Political Behavior•1997

  • Constituency Congruency and Candidate Competition in U.S. House Elections

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Michael H Crespin et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2011

  • Strategic Challenger Entry in a Federal System

    Open Access•Steven Rogers•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Campaign War Chests and Challenger Quality in Senate Elections

    Open Access•Jay Goodliffe•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Iraq Casualties and the 2006 Senate Elections

    Open Access•Douglas L Kriner, Francis X Shen•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Examining Legislative Cue‐Taking in the US Senate

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Janet Box‐steffensmeier et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Quotas and qualifications

    Open Access•Ana Catalano Weeks, Lisa Baldez•European Political Science Review•2015

  • Candidate Ethnicity and Vote Choice in Britain

    Open Access•Fisher, Stephen D Fisher et al.•British Journal of Political…•2015

  • Beyond Partisanship

    Charles R Hunt•Congress & the Presidency•2021

  • Do Negative Messages Work

    Open Access•Kim Fridkin, Kim Leslie Fridkin et al.•American Politics Research•2004

  • Fundamental models for forecasting elections at the state level

    Open Access•Patrick Hummel, David Rothschild•Electoral Studies•2014

  • The Effect of Candidate Quality on Electoral Equilibrium

    Open Access•Enriqueta Aragones, Thomas R Palfrey•American Political Science Review•2004

  • Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections

    Jon R Bond, Cary R Covington et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Evaluating Presidential Candidates

    David P Gla, David P Glass•Public Opinion Quarterly•1985

  • Incumbent Popularity, Challenger Invisibility, and Congressional Voters

    Open Access•Lyn Ragsdale•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1981

  • Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent

    Donald P Green, Jonathan S Krasno•American Journal of Political…•1988

  • Competitiveness of Senate Seats and Voting Behavior in Senate Elections

    Mark C Westlye•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • Representatives' Actions and Challengers' Reactions

    Lyn Ragsdale, Timothy E Cook•American Journal of Political…•1987

  • Explaining Senate Election Outcomes

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz•American Political Science Review•1988

  • Strategic Politicians and Unresponsive Voters

    Open Access•Richard Born, Richard T Born•American Political Science Review•1986

Unique citing works49
Citations per year1,53
Citation span1994 - 2024 (31)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 49

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae