A New Collective Bargain? A Multicase Comparison of U.S. Labor Union Strategy

Bibliographic Data

ID7335694
AuthorsSara Gia Trongone (0000-0001-5124-7618, Sara Gia Trongone is a doctoral student in the Department of Sociology at University of Wisconsin-Madison., corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume27
Issue2
Pages149-168
Publication date2022-06-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMobilization An International Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1086-671X • E-ISSN: 1938-1514
PublisherMobilization Journal (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.17813/1086-671x-27-2-149
OpenAlexW4285008838
LanguageEN
Citations received4

Twenty-five years ago, a vocal faction of progressive union leaders, labor educators, and academics charted a new path forward for American labor unions. Proponents of “social movement unionism” sought to reverse unions’ flagging strength through redoubled organizing drives, street mobilizations, “public dramas,” and labor-community coalitions. While case studies describing this repertoire of contention abound, there are few systematic analyses that take stock of emergent union strategy. Based on an analysis of 76 case studies of union-led collective-bargaining campaigns, strikes, and political mobilizations, I argue that contemporary labor union revitalization is best understood not as a singular, movement-inspired struggle but as a mix of four strategies— sometimes competing, sometimes complementary—each espousing divergent visions for how to recapture social, economic, and political power. These divergent visions, in turn, shape how unions form alliances and construct class-based identities

Collective bargaining · Economics · Labor union · Labour economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Social movement · Sociology · Trade union · Vision · Labor Movements and Unions · Law

Tools

Open DOI