Dados Bibliográficos

AUTOR(ES) Jeff Niederdeppe , Rainer Romero-Canyas , Helen H Joo , David Acup , C. Skurka , May Hawas
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Office of the Chief Scientist, Environmental Defense Fund, New York, NY 10010, USA, Digital Marketing and Strategy, Environmental Defense Fund, Washington, DC 20009, USA, Pennsylvania State University
ANO 2018
TIPO Book
ADICIONADO EM 2025-08-14
MD5 DEF4164A558040641C7E695F9D2AEF65
MD5 3B464AF3A854D7A6D2B0BEFB66851511

Resumo

There is much need to verify the robustness of published findings in the field of communication—particularly regarding the effects of persuasive emotional appeals about social issues. To this end, we present the results from a preregistered, direct replication of C. Skurka, J. Niederdeppe, R. Romero-Canyas, and D. Acup (2018). The original study found that a threat appeal about climate change can increase risk perception and activism intentions and that a humor appeal can also increase activism intentions with a large sample of young adults. Using the same stimuli, measures, and experimental design with a similar sample, we fail to replicate these main effects. We do, however, replicate age as a moderator of humor's effect on perceived risk, such that the humor appeal only persuaded emerging adults (ages 18–21.9). We consider several explanations for our discrepant findings, including the challenges (and opportunities) that persuasion researchers must navigate when communicating about rapidly evolving social issues.

Ferramentas