Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Effect of Nafta on Energy and Environmental Efficiency in Mexico

Bibliographic Data

ID7350795
AuthorsDavid I Stern (0000-0001-6595-4268, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume35
Issue2
Pages291-322
Publication date2007-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolicy Studies Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1541-0072.2007.00221.x
OpenAlexW2087501713
LanguageEN
Citations received19
References cited39

Prior to Mexico's entry to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), predictions of the consequent impact on the environment in that country ranged from the dire to very optimistic. This article investigates NAFTA's outcomes in terms of energy use and the emission of atmospheric pollutants. Specifically, has entry into NAFTA led to a convergence or divergence in indicators of emissions, environmental efficiency, and emissions‐specific technology in Mexico, the United States, and Canada? A battery of tests is applied to these indicators for energy use and carbon, sulfur, and NOx emissions in the three countries. The results show that the extreme predictions of the outcomes of NAFTA have not materialized. Rather, trends that were already present before the introduction of NAFTA continue and, in some cases, improve post‐NAFTA, but not yet in a dramatic way. There is strong evidence of convergence across the three countries toward a lower intensity of energy use and emissions per unit of GDP. Although intensity is rising initially for some variables in Mexico, it eventually begins to fall post‐NAFTA. Per capita emissions of sulfur and NOx also show convergence, but this is not the case for energy and carbon, and the latter variables also drift moderately upwards. The state of technology in energy efficiency and sulfur abatement is improving in all countries, although there is little, if any, sign of convergence and NAFTA has no effect on the rate of technology diffusion. However, total energy use and carbon emissions increase both pre‐ and post‐NAFTA and total NOx emissions increase in Mexico. Only total sulfur emissions are stable and falling in all three NAFTA partners

Convergence (economics · Economics · Efficient energy use · Energy intensity · International economics · International trade · Macroeconomics · Per capita · Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies · Energy, Environment, Economic Growth · Engineering · Environmental Impact and Sustainability

  • The Environmental Kuznets Curve

    Richard T Carson•Review of Environmental Economics…•2010

  • The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years

    Open Access•David I Stern•Journal of Bioeconomics•2017

  • The Green Solow model

    Open Access•William A Brock, M Scott Taylor•Journal of Economic Growth•2010

  • The political economy of energy transition

    Open Access•Alex O Acheampong, Eric Evans Osei Opoku et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2023

  • Nafta Commission for Environmental Cooperation

    Chantal Line Carpentier•Impact Assessment and Project…•2006

  • On the non-convergence of energy intensities

    Open Access•Yannick Le Pen, Benoît Sévi•Ecological Economics•2010

  • Between estimates of the emissions-income elasticity

    Open Access•David I Stern•Ecological Economics•2010

  • Do deep and comprehensive regional trade agreements help in reducing air pollution

    Open Access•Inmaculada Martinez-Zarzoso, Walid Oueslati•International Environmental…•2018

  • Globalization and politico‐administrative factor‐driven energy‐growth nexus

    Open Access•Monirul Islam, Md Monirul Islam et al.•Journal of Public Affairs•2021

  • The environmental impacts of globalisation and corruption

    Open Access•Patrícia Hipólito Leal, António Cardoso Marques•Environmental Science & Policy•2020

  • Nafta and environment after 25 years

    Open Access•Fiona Gladstone, Diana Liverman et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2021

  • Offsetting Openness? The Impact of Gender Provisions on US Trade With Developing Countries

    Open Access•Seungbin Park, Megan Roosevelt•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Transnational linkages and the spillover of environment-efficiency into developing countries

    Open Access•Richard Perkins, E Neumayer•Global Environmental Change•2009

  • Reversal of the trend in global anthropogenic sulfur emissions

    Open Access•David I Stern•Global Environmental Change•2006

  • Global value chains and firms’ environmental performance

    Open Access•Samuel Siewers, Inmaculada Martinez-Zarzoso et al.•World Development•2023

  • Can China railway express improve environmental efficiency? Evidence from China's cities

    Open Access•Shuo Hu, Ailun Wang et al.•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2023

  • Use of the OECD in justifying policy reforms

    P Alasuutari, Ari Rasimus•Journal of Power•2009

  • Nafta, Cafta and the Environment

    Open Access•Sherrie Baver, Sherrie L Baver•IdeAs•2011

  • The troika of energy consumption, economic growth, and CO 2 emission

    Open Access•Saleem Khan, Noor Jehan et al.•Geographical Journal•2023

  • Econometric Estimation of Technical and Environmental Efficiency

    Open Access•Stijn Reinhard, C A Knox Lovell et al.•American Journal of Agricultural…•1999

  • Trade, Growth, and the Environment

    Brian R Copeland, M Scott Taylor•Journal of Economic Literature•2004

  • Corruption, Pollution, and the Kuznets Environment Curve

    Open Access•Ramón López and, Siddhartha Mitra•Journal of Environmental…•2000

  • Is There an Environmental Kuznets Curve for Sulfur?

    Open Access•David I Stern, Michael Common et al.•Journal of Environmental…•2001

  • Are U.S. regional incomes converging?

    Open Access•Gerald A Carlino, Leonard O Mills•Journal of Monetary Economics•1993

  • The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock, and the Unit Root Hypothesis

    Pierre Perron•Econometrica•1989

  • Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement

    Gene M Grossman, Gene Grossman et al.•National Bureau of Economic…•1991

  • Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels

    Open Access•Kyung So Im, M Hashem Pesaran et al.•Journal of Econometrics•2003

  • Economic Growth and the Environment

    Gene M Grossman, Alan B Krueger•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1995

  • Poverty and pollution abatement

    Open Access•Francis G Hilton•Ecological Economics•2006

  • US environmental load displacement

    Open Access•Matthew Cole, Matthew A Cole•Ecological Economics•2004

  • Explaining changes in global sulfur emissions

    Open Access•David I Stern•Ecological Economics•2002

  • The Rise and Fall of the Environmental Kuznets Curve

    Open Access•David I Stern•World Development•2004

  • Patterns of historical CO2 intensity transitions among high and low-income countries

    Open Access•Magnus Lindmark•Explorations in Economic History•2004

  • Theory of Cost and Production Functions

    Graham Pyatt, Ronald W Shephard•The Economic Journal•1972

  • The International Diffusion of New Technologies

    Richard Perkins, E Neumayer•Annals of the Association of…•2005

  • Economic growth and environmental degradation

    Open Access•David I Stern, Michael Common et al.•World Development•1996

  • Empirics for economic growth and convergence

    Open Access•Danny Quah, Danny T Quah•European Economic Review•1996

  • Confronting the Environmental Kuznets Curve

    Open Access•Dasgupta, Susmita Dasgupta et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2002

Unique citing works19
Citations per year0,95
Citation span2006 - 2026 (21)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 19

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae