Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The rat race and working time regulation

Bibliographic Data

ID7354282
AuthorsMalte Jauch (0000-0003-3599-6293, University of Essex, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume19
Issue3
Pages293-314
Publication date2020-05-27
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitics Philosophy & Economics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1470-594X • E-ISSN: 1741-3060
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1470594x20927894
OpenAlexW3031107366
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited22

To what extent, if at all, should a just society adopt public policies that regulate and limit the amount of time people work? Attempts to answer this question face a dilemma: Either, we can adopt a laissez-faire view, according to which governments must refrain from imposing working time policies on the labour market. But this view generates a situation in which many citizens experience deep regret about the balance between work and leisure in their lives. Or, we can endorse an interventionist view that advocates government imposition of working time policies. However, such a view appears to be objectionably perfectionist insofar as it imposes on citizens a particular conception of the ideal balance between work and leisure. This article proposes a way out of this dilemma. It shows that the interventionist view can be defended on the anti-perfectionist grounds that this helps address a collective action problem in the labour market – the working time rat race. Employers often use working time as a proxy for their employees’ productivity and commitment. Those who work particularly long hours are often awarded benefits such as raises or promotions or are spared from dismissals. This makes it individually rational for each worker to work extra hours in an attempt to outcompete colleagues. However, if many workers pursue this strategy, it loses its effectiveness. Workers with preferences for more leisure have a claim to state intervention to remove the rat race when this doesn’t impose disproportionate harm on third parties

Balance (ability · Dilemma · Economics · Harm · Law and economics · Political science · Regret · Sociology · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Employment and Welfare Studies · Law · Psychology · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Beyond the Box

    Open Access•Fernando Santos, Alex Lascu et al.•Quest•2026

  • In Cash We Trust

    Open Access•Tom Parr•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2024

  • The Socialization Costs and Benefits of Work

    Open Access•Íñigo González-Ricoy•The Journal of Ethics•2025

  • Work Emails at the Breakfast Table

    Open Access•Alastair James•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2024

  • The Welfare Argument for Free Time Protection

    Open Access•Malte Jauch•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2024

  • Circadian Justice

    Open Access•Jonathan White•Journal of Political Philosophy•2021

  • Meaningful work, nonperfectionism, and reciprocity

    Caleb Althorpe•Critical Review of International…•2022

  • Free Time Across the Life Course

    Open Access•Malte Jauch•Political Studies•2023

  • The Future of Work? The Political Theory of Work and Leisure

    Open Access•Julie L Rose•Annual Review of Political Science•2024

  • The Impact of Reduced Working Hours and Furlough Policies on Workers' Mental Health at the Onset of Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Senhu Wang, D Kamerade et al.•Journal of Social Policy•2024

  • Diminishing Returns at Work

    John H Pencavel•Diminishing Returns at Work•2018

  • Free Time and Economic Class

    Open Access•Lucas Stanczyk•Law, Ethics and Philosophy•2018

  • Free Time

    Open Access•Julie L Rose, Julie Rose•Free Time•2016

  • Karl Marx's Theory of History

    Open Access•Gerald Allan Cohen•Karl Marx's Theory of History•1979

  • What We Owe to Each Other

    T M Scanlon, Thomas Scanlon•What We Owe to Each Other•2000

  • Money Does Not Guarantee Time

    Open Access•Julie L Rose•Journal of Political Philosophy•2013

  • In the Face of Austerity

    Open Access•Véronique Munoz‐Dardé•Journal of Political Philosophy•2013

  • Mill, Rawls and Cohen on Incentives and Occupational Freedom

    Open Access•Paula Casal•Utilitas•2016

  • When Too Much Is Not Enough

    Open Access•Jeremy Reynolds•Sociological Forum•2004

  • The Part‐Time Pay Penalty for Women in Britain

    Open Access•Alan Manning, Barbara Petrongolo•The Economic Journal•2008

  • Private education, positional goods, and the arms race problem

    Open Access•Daniel Halliday•Politics Philosophy & Economics•2015

  • Always Aggregate

    Open Access•Joe Horton•Philosophy & Public Affairs•2018

  • The Problem with Work

    Kathi Weeks•Problem with Work•2011

  • A shorter working week for everyone

    Open Access•D Kamerade, Senhu Wang et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2019

  • Pursuing Preferences

    Open Access•Jeremy Reynolds, Lydia Aletraris•American Sociological Review•2006

  • Is Work Special? Justice and the Distribution of Employment

    Open Access•Richard J Arneson•American Political Science Review•1990

Citations per year2
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae