Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Issues of Federalism in Response to Terrorism

Bibliographic Data

ID7362344
AuthorsJohn Kincaid (0000-0003-3824-3254, Lafayette College), Richard L Cole (The University of Texas at Arlington)
Year2002
Volume62
Issues1
Pages181-192
Publication date2002-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/1540-6210.62.s1.28
OpenAlexW2113920780
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited3

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, provoked, among other reactions, considerable commentary about the future of American federalism, particularly predictions of administrative centralization. To assess the potential impact of terrorism on U.S. intergovernmental relations and the ways the federal system should respond, members of the American Political Science Association’s Section on Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations were surveyed in late 2001. Generally, these federalism scholars believe the September 11 terrorism will have little effect on intergovernmental relations or on the U.S. Supreme Court’s state–friendly jurisprudence, and the surge in public trust and confidence in the federal government will be short–lived. The scholars tend to support a highly federalized response to terrorism, but with intergovernmental cooperation. Partisan differences among the scholars on policy options, however, mirror the party differences in Congress and the resurgence of “politics as usual” less than a year after September 11, 2001

Federalism · Government (linguistics · Jurisprudence · New Federalism · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · Supreme court · Terrorism · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Public Administration

  • Mandates and Management Challenges in the Trenches

    Open Access•Kiki Caruson, SUSAN A MacMANUS•Public Administration Review•2006

  • Cyber Security Responsibilization

    Open Access•Karen Renaud, Craig P Orgeron et al.•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Covid ‐19 pandemic control and administrative issues in Pakistan

    Open Access•Muhammad Ahsan Ali Raza, Chen Yan et al.•Journal of Public Affairs•2021

  • Understanding the gap between perceived threats to and preparedness for cybersecurity

    Open Access•Taehyun Nam•Technology in Society•2019

  • Adapting Intergovernmental Management to the New Age of Terrorism

    Open Access•James A Stever•Administration & Society•2005

  • The U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations

    Open Access•John Kincaid•Public Administration Review•2011

  • Bioterrorism, Fear, and Public Health Reform

    Open Access•George Avery•Public Administration Review•2004

  • Continuity and Change

    Carol S Weissert, Carl W Stenberg et al.•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2009

  • Precursor Crimes to Terrorism and the Local Prosecutor's Role in Disruption

    M Elaine Nugent‐borakove•International Journal of…•2008

  • De Facto Devolution and Urban Defunding

    John Kincaid•Journal of Urban Affairs•1999

  • Devolution

    Richard L Cole, Rodney V Hissong et al.•Publius The Journal of Federalism•1999

  • Public Opinion and American Federalism

    Richard L Cole, John Kincaid•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2000

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,41
Citation span2004 - 2021 (18)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae