Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Digitalization and the green transition

Different challenges, same policy responses

Bibliographic Data

ID7366928
AuthorsMarius R Busemeyer (0000-0003-4085-1689), Sophia Stutzmann (0009-0007-9039-4494), Tobias Tober (0000-0001-7237-2936)
Year2024
Volume19
Issue2
Pages422-447
Publication date2024-09-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRegulation & Governance (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1748-5983 • E-ISSN: 1748-5991
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/rego.12624
OpenAlexW4402244477
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited110

How do citizens perceive labor market risks related to digitalization and the green transition, and how do these risk perceptions translate into preferences for social policies? We address these questions in this paper by studying the policy preferences of individual workers on how governments should deal with the two labor market challenges of digitalization and the green transition. Employing novel cross‐country comparative survey data including a vignette experiment for six advanced postindustrial economies, we probe to what extent the different labor market challenges are associated with differences in preferences, distinguishing between support for social investment policies on the one hand and compensatory policies on the other. A first finding is that even though individuals perceive different levels of labor market risk due to the green transition and digitalization, their preferences for social policy responses do not differ systematically across the two risks. Instead, we find that social policy preferences are affected by individual‐level and, to some extent, country‐level contextual factors. Confirming previous work, higher perceived labor market risk is associated with more support for compensatory policies but less support for social investment

Business · Economic system · Economics · Environmental economics · Environmental planning · Natural resource economics · Political science · Public economics · Transition (genetics · Chemistry · Environmental Science · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · ICT Impact and Policies · Regional Development and Policy

  • Funding the future

    Open Access•Sophia Stutzmann, Sebastian Koo et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2026

  • Well‐Being Economy in the Visegrad Countries

    Open Access•Olivér Kovács, Endre Domonkos•Regulation & Governance•2025

  • Green Subsidies and the Promotion of Eco‐Social Policy in Germany and the United States

    Open Access•Barbara Bender, Daniel Kinderman•Regulation & Governance•2025

  • Eco-Social Divides in Europe

    Open Access•Antje Otto, Dimitri Gugushvili•Sustainability•2020

  • A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models

    Andrew Gelman, Aleks Jakulin et al.•The Annals of Applied Statistics•2008

  • Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and Waic

    Open Access•Aki Vehtari, Andrew Gelman et al.•Statistics and Computing•2017

  • Public Support for Sustainable Welfare Compared

    Open Access•Miriam Fritz, Martin Fritz et al.•Sustainability•2019

  • The Adjustment of Labor Markets to Robots

    Open Access•Wolfgang Dauth, Sebastian Findeisen et al.•Journal of the European Economic…•2021

  • Explaining Job Polarization

    Maarten Goos, Alan Manning et al.•American Economic Review•2014

  • From Policy Measures to Policy Packages

    Moshe Givoni, James Macmillen et al.•Transport Reviews•2013

  • Bayesian Item Response Modeling in R with brms and Stan

    Open Access•Paul-Christian Bürkner•Journal of Statistical Software•2021

  • Do green jobs differ from non-green jobs in terms of skills and human capital?

    Open Access•Davide Consoli, Giovanni Marin et al.•Research Policy•2016

  • Lessons from Germany’s hard coal mining phase-out

    Open Access•Pao-Yu Oei, Hanna Brauers et al.•Climate Policy•2020

  • BRMS

    Open Access•Paul-Christian Bürkner•Journal of Statistical Software•2017

  • The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change

    David Autor, D H Autor et al.•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2003

  • The future of employment

    Open Access•Carl Benedikt Frey, Michael A Osborne•Technological Forecasting and…•2017

  • Automation Risk, Social Policy Preferences, and Political Participation

    Thomas Kurer, Silja Häusermann•Digitalization and the Welfare…•2022

  • The World Politics of Social Investment: Volume I

    Julian Garritzmann, Julian L Garritzmann et al.•World Politics of Social…•2022

  • The Uses of Social Investment

    C Sabel, J Zeitlin et al.•The Uses of Social Investment•2017

  • Artificial Intelligence and Jobs

    Daron Acemoglu, David Autor et al.•Journal of Labor Economics•2022

  • Globalization, robotization, and electoral outcomes

    Open Access•Mauro Caselli, Andrea Fracasso et al.•Journal of Regional Science•2021

  • Has ICT Polarized Skill Demand? Evidence from Eleven Countries over Twenty-Five Years

    Guy Michaels, Ashwini Natraj et al.•The Review of Economics and…•2014

  • Lousy and Lovely Jobs

    Maarten Goos, Alan Manning•The Review of Economics and…•2007

  • Backlash to fossil fuel phase-outs

    Open Access•Florian Egli, Nicolas Schmid et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • Combining climate, economic, and social policy builds public support for climate action in the US

    Open Access•Parrish Bergquist, Matto Mildenberger et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • Automation and the future of the welfare state

    Open Access•Clau Dermont, David Weisstanner•Political Research Exchange•2020

  • Dividing the pie in the eco-social state

    Open Access•Niklas Jakobsson, Raya Muttarak et al.•Environment and Planning C…•2017

  • Concerned about coal

    Open Access•Adam Mayer, E Keith Smith et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • I earned the right to build the next American car”

    Open Access•Jennifer M Silva, Sanya Carley et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2023

  • The “losers of automation”

    Open Access•Zhen Jie Im, Nonna Mayer et al.•Research & Politics•2019

  • Shrinking and shouting

    Open Access•Thomas Kurer, Bruno Palier•Research & Politics•2019

  • Did State Responses to Automation Matter for Voters

    Open Access•Jane Gingrich•Research & Politics•2019

  • The green transition and its potential territorial discontents

    Open Access•Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, Federico Bartalucci•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2023

  • Preferred policy responses to technological change

    Open Access•Marius R Busemeyer, Mia Katharina Gandenberger et al.•Socio-Economic Review•2022

  • Determinants of Public Support for Eco-Social Policies

    Open Access•Dimitri Gugushvili, Antje Otto•Social Policy and Society•2021

  • The electoral importance and evolution of climate‐related energy policy

    Open Access•Maximilian Lüth, Lena Maria Schaffer•Swiss Political Science Review•2022

  • Public attitudes towards climate change

    Open Access•Gizem Arikan, Gizem Arıkan et al.•The British Journal of Politics…•2020

  • Rethinking country effects

    Open Access•Caroline Lloyd, Jonathan Payne•New Technology Work and Employment•2019

  • Robots and Jobs

    Daron Acemoglu, Pascual Restrepo•Journal of Political Economy•2019

  • Untangling Trade and Technology

    Open Access•David H Autor, David Autor et al.•The Economic Journal•2015

  • Social Investment, Redistribution or Basic Income? Exploring the Association Between Automation Risk and Welfare State Attitudes in Europe

    Open Access•Marius R Busemeyer, Alexander H J Sahm•Journal of Social Policy•2022

  • Public demand for social investment

    Julian Garritzmann, Julian L Garritzmann et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2018

  • Public opinion on policy and budgetary trade-offs in European welfare states

    Marius R Busemeyer, Julian Garritzmann et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2017

  • How Popular Are Social Investment Policies Really? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Eight Western European Countries

    Open Access•Erik Neimanns, Marius R Busemeyer et al.•European Sociological Review•2018

  • Voting for Populism in Europe

    Open Access•Helen V Milner•Comparative Political Studies•2021

  • Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration

    Open Access•Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2002

  • The effects of policy design complexity on public support for climate policy

    Open Access•Lukas Paul Fesenfeld•Behavioural Public Policy•2022

  • When Effect Becomes Cause

    Open Access•Paul Pierson•World Politics•1993

  • Electoral Backlash or Positive Reinforcement? Wind Power and Congressional Elections in the United States

    Johannes Urpelainen, Alice Tianbo Zhang•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • How Do Pocketbook and Distributional Concerns Affect Citizens’ Preferences for Carbon Taxation

    Liam F Beiser-Mcgrath, Thomas Bernauer•The Journal of Politics•2024

  • Neither Left Behind nor Superstar

    Aina Gallego, Thomas Kurer et al.•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • Compensating for the Climate

    Open Access•Daniel Yuichi Kono•Political Studies•2020

  • How technological change affects regional voting patterns

    Open Access•Nikolas Schöll, Thomas Kurer•Political Science Research and…•2024

  • Misattributed blame? Attitudes toward globalization in the age of automation

    Open Access•Nicole Wu•Political Science Research and…•2022

  • Public opinion on welfare state recalibration in times of austerity

    Open Access•Björn Bremer, Reto Bürgisser•Political Science Research and…•2023

  • Paths and Forks or Chutes and Ladders

    Open Access•Kent Weaver•Journal of Public Policy•2010

  • Can policy-packaging increase public support for costly policies? Insights from a choice experiment on policies against vehicle emissions

    Open Access•Michael L Wicki, Robert A Huber et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2020

  • Fiscal policy preferences, trade-offs, and support for social investment

    Open Access•Björn Bremer, Marius R Busemeyer•Journal of Public Policy•2022

  • Trade-offs between redistribution and environmental protection

    Klaus Armingeon, Reto Bürgisser•Journal of European Public Policy•2021

  • Why parties take up digitization in their manifestos

    Pascal D König, Georg Wenzelburger•Journal of European Public Policy•2019

  • Paying the piper for the Green Transition? Perceptions of unfairness from regional employment declines in carbon-polluting industrial sectors

    Zhen Jie Im•Journal of European Public Policy•2024

  • The discursive construction of digitalization

    Open Access•Matteo Marenco, T Seidl•European Political Science Review•2021

  • Global warming and polarization. Wind turbines and the electoral success of the greens and the populist radical right

    Open Access•Cyrill Otteni, Manès Weisskircher•European Journal of Political…•2022

  • Transitions to the Knowledge Economy in Germany, Sweden, and the Netherlands

    Kathleen Thelen•Comparative Politics•2019

  • The Politics of Trade-Offs

    Open Access•Silja Häusermann, Thomas Kurer et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2019

  • Dealing with Technological Change

    Open Access•Marius R Busemeyer, Tobias Tober•Comparative Political Studies•2023

  • Risks and Redistribution

    Open Access•Philipp Rehm•Comparative Political Studies•2009

  • Technological Risk and Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Aina Gallego, Andrew Kuo et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2022

  • Automation and the Welfare State

    Open Access•Stefan Thewissen, David Rueda•Comparative Political Studies•2019

  • The Declining Middle

    Open Access•Thomas Kurer•Comparative Political Studies•2020

  • Automation, Digitalization, and Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace

    Open Access•Aina Gallego, Thomas Kurer•Annual Review of Political Science•2022

  • Electoral Backlash against Climate Policy

    Open Access•Leah C Stokes, Leah Stokes•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • The Public as Thermostat

    Christopher Wlezien•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Beyond Positive and Negative

    Open Access•Marius R Busemeyer, Aurélien Abrassart et al.•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Automation risk and support for welfare policies

    Open Access•Zhen Jie Im•Journal of International and…•2020

  • Comparing coal phase-out pathways

    Open Access•Hanna Brauers, Pao-Yu Oei et al.•Environmental Innovation and…•2020

  • The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market

    David H Autor, David Autor et al.•American Economic Review•2013

  • Habitus and climate change

    Open Access•Miriam Fritz, Max Koch et al.•British Journal of Sociology•2021

  • Jobs vs. climate justice? Contentious narratives of labor and climate movements in the coal transition in Germany

    Tobias Kalt•Environmental Politics•2021

  • Automation and New Tasks

    Open Access•Daron Acemoglu, Pascual Restrepo•The Journal of Economic…•2019

  • Politicizing climate change in times of populism

    Jens Marquardt, Markus Lederer•Environmental Politics•2022

  • How to Get Coal Country to Vote for Climate Policy

    Open Access•Diane Bolet, Fergus Green et al.•American Political Science Review•2024

  • Creating Climate Coalitions

    Open Access•Nilesh Gaikwad, Federica Genovese et al.•American Political Science Review•2022

  • Climate change and the welfare state? Exploring Australian attitudes to climate and social policy

    Open Access•Ben Spies-Butcher, Adam Stebbing•Journal of Sociology•2016

  • Is There a Link between Welfare Regime and Attitudes toward Climate Policy Instruments

    Open Access•Jukka Sivonen, Iida Kukkonen•Sociological Perspectives•2021

  • Building the Eco-social State

    Open Access•Max Koch, Miriam Fritz et al.•Journal of Social Policy•2014

Unique citing works3
Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae