Críticas à teoria da escolha racional e hierarquias de conhecimento na ciência política

Bibliographic Data

ID7368186
AuthorsEnzo Lenine (0000-0001-5280-4252, corresponding author), Enzo Lima
Year2018
Issue85
Pages77-103
Publication date2018-08-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRevista Brasileira de Informação Bibliográfica em Ciências Sociais (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1516-8085 • E-ISSN: 2317-6644
PublisherANPOCS (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.17666/bib8504/2018
OpenAlexW2885468640
LanguagePT
References cited8

Critiques of rational choice theory and hierarchies of knowledge in political scienceThe rational choice theory has become an anathema in contemporary political science.Ever since the first models of rational choice were created, theorists of this line are criticized by the epistemological content of their studies, as well as by the use of formal models as the methodological approach of political phenomena.The criticism occurs in different disciplines, namely psychology, economics and political science.This article reconstructs the debates that occurred within behavioral and cognitive sciences, as well as in political science itself, seeking to understand how they were developed.This article also presents bibliometric data on the recent production in rational choice theory and discusses how they reveal hierarchies of knowledge about the alleged prominence of rational choice models in the major political science journals

Education and Public Policy · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access