La reanimación de la prevalencia. ¿Una grieta abierta en nuestro modelo centralizado de justicia constitucional
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7368878 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tomás De La Quadra-Salcedo Janini (0000-0002-4625-6154, Tribunal Constitucional, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Issue | 111 |
| Pages | 307-340 |
| Publication date | 2017-12-11 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0211-5743 • E-ISSN: 1885-6721 |
| Publisher | Centro de Estudios Politicos y Constitucionales (PUBLISHER • ES) |
| DOI | 10.18042/cepc/redc.111.10 |
| OpenAlex | W2774248400 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 1 |
The obligation that a new jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court imposes on the ordinary judicial organs to not apply the autonomic law that contradicts the basic state regulation in application of the principle of prevalence recognized in art. 149.3 EC is an exception to the centralized model of judicial review and generates two consequences: greater legal uncertainty in relation to the constitutional system of distribution of powers and the impossibility for the autonomous parliaments to defend the conformity of the regional law with that system
Conformity · Constitution · Constitutional court · Constitutional review · Humanities · Impossibility · Jurisprudence · Obligation · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection · Human Rights and Immigration · Mathematics · Law · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |