Response to Pennsylvania's Agricultural Preservation Programs 1
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7373791 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lisa Bourke (0000-0003-0411-6193, The University of Sydney), Steve Jacob (0000-0001-8301-2151, Pennsylvania State University), A E Luloff (Pennsylvania State University) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 606-629 |
| Publication date | 1996-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Rural Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-0112 • E-ISSN: 1549-0831 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1549-0831.1996.tb00636.x |
| OpenAlex | W2148356988 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 6 |
Agriculture is the leading industry in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. At the same time, encroaching development has pressured prime agricultural land to change uses, a change usually considered irreversible. Some regions of Pennsylvania have used zoning to control and plan for the development of agricultural land, but these decisions have not always been agreed on. In response to conflicts over zoning and calls for more effective restrictions of development of prime agricultural soils, the state government implemented agricultural preservation programs designed to ensure the future viability of Pennsylvania's agriculture. While response has been reported as favorable, most reviews relied on voters' support of a state referendum to fund agricultural preservation programs. Few have examined local responses to the implementation of these programs. This paper explores local community responses to agricultural preservation and the state's programs in three regions of Pennsylvania which differ in levels of urban presence and pressure. Using secondary sources, qualitative data, and general population surveys, this analysis provides implications about strategies of agricultural preservation in a state which leads in such efforts
Agricultural economics · Agricultural land · Agriculture · Archaeology · Business · Commonwealth · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental protection · Geography · Government (linguistics · Land use · Political science · Politics · Population · Referendum · Sociology · State (computer science · Zoning · Engineering · Law · Organic Food and Agriculture
| Citations per year | 0.07 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1998 - 2001 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |