Habermasian communication pathologies in do‐not‐resuscitate discussions at the end of life

The focus on patient autonomy in American and increasingly British medicine highlights the importance of choice. However, to truly honour patient autonomy, there must be both understanding and non‐control. Fifty‐eight semi‐structured in‐depth interviews were conducted with internal medicine physicians at three hospitals in the US and one in the UK . At hospitals where autonomy was prioritised, trainees equated autonomy with giving a menu of choices and felt uncomfortable giving a recommendation based on clinical knowledge as they worried that that would infringe upon patient autonomy. Employing Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action, this paper explores how physician trainees’ communication practices of using purposefully graphic descriptions of resuscitation to discourage that choice prevent greater understanding and compromise non‐control. Central to this problem are also issues of colonisation of the life‐world by the system. Physicians are fully inculcated in their respect for autonomy but unintentionally resort to strategic forms of communication that prevent patients from adequately understanding their situation because trainees feel constrained against making recommendations. However, if the ideal of autonomy is to be realised, physicians might have to move towards practices that embrace a more authentic autonomy that fosters open communication that allows for co‐creation of consensus between doctors and patients

Autonomy · Compromise · Honour · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Ethics in medical practice · Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Psychology · Social Psychology

• Miles apart

  Open Access•Katrina Hauschildt•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  Incluir item

• How individual ethical frameworks shape physician trainees’ experiences providing end-of-life care

  Sarah Rosenwohl-Mack, Daniel Dohan et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2021

  Incluir item

• Strategies for Collaborative Consideration of Patients' Resuscitation Preferences

  Open Access•Kimberly Kopecky, Pete Pelletier et al.•The AMA Journal of Ethic•2020

  Incluir item

• The convivial and the pastoral in patient-doctor relationships

  Open Access•John Macartney, Rikke Sand Andersen et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2020

  Incluir item

• Towards the Proletarianization of Physicians

  Open Access•John B Mckinlay, Joan Arches•International Journal of Health…•1985

  Incluir item

• The End of the Golden Age of Doctoring

  Open Access•John B Mckinlay, Lisa D Marceau et al.•International Journal of Health…•2002

  Incluir item

• Corporatization and the Social Transformation of Doctoring

  Open Access•John B Mckinlay, John D Stoeckle•International Journal of Health…•1988

  Incluir item

• Habermas, Critical Theory and Health

  Graham Scambler•Habermas, Critical Theory and…•2013

  Incluir item

• Introduction to Critical Theory

  David Held•Introduction to Critical Theory•1980

  Incluir item

• The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences

  Robert Alun Jones, Quentin Skinner•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1986

  Incluir item

• Public Challenge of Physician Authority

  Marie R Haug, Bebe Lavin•Medical Care•1979

  Incluir item

• Patient empowerment and control

  Open Access•Pierre Salmon, Peter Salmon et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2003

  Incluir item

• Giving voice to the lifeworld. More humane, more effective medical care? A qualitative study of doctor-patient communication in general practice

  Open Access•Christine A Barry, Fiona A Stevenson et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2001

  Incluir item

• Central Problems in Social Theory

  Open Access•Anthony Giddens•Central Problems In Social Theory…•1979

  Incluir item