Solar industrialization, ‘sacrifice zones,’ and new environmental movements
Emerging discourses of commonality and critique in Portugal’s energy transition
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7397155 |
|---|---|
| Authors | R Jay Wallace (0000-0003-3920-6770), Kaya Schwemmlein (0000-0003-3911-4489), Susana Batel (0000-0002-6586-6716) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1293-1312 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-26 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sustainability Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1862-4057 • E-ISSN: 1862-4065 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s11625-025-01661-3 |
| OpenAlex | W4408954067 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 71 |
The transition to renewable energy is being pursued within neoliberal frameworks that prioritize market competition and industrial development, increasingly resulting in significant negative socio-ecological consequences and environmental injustices. As a result, scholars and activists are increasingly taking up more radical discursive strategies, adopting critical terms like ‘sacrifice zone,’ to describe marginalized places. In short, critiques of fossil fuel regimes are increasingly accompanied by an emerging critique of hegemonic renewable energy regimes. Through a case study of community resistance to a large-scale solar PV project in Alentejo, Portugal, this article aims to further understand this critique by analysing the arguments and discursive strategies that local movements are utilizing against business-as-usual renewable energy transitions and how they are received by powerful actors. Findings reveal that opposition is not solely driven by self-interest or place-attachment, but is deeply rooted in critiques of procedural and distributive injustices, framed through the critical and constructive discourse of ‘sacrifice zone’ which not only enabled residents to make sense of what was happening, but also allowed them to build new forms of territorial commonality and critique. This study highlights how the concept of the ‘sacrifice zone’ functions as a means of co-producing new knowledge and as a tool for explaining and coping with change. From the perspective of pragmatic sociology, it can also be viewed as a critical strategy of self-vulnerabilization—one that resists change, demands recognition, challenges state authority, and attempts to foster new territorial movements
Biology · Economic geography · Economic system · Economics · Energy transition · Environmental ethics · Environmental resource management · Geography · Industrialisation · Landscape ecology · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Energy and Environment Impacts · Environmental Science · Philosophy · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Ecology
Is Deep-Sea Mining the New “Green Frontier”? A Corpus-assisted Discourse Analysis of Arguments on the Climate Crisis and Deep-Sea Mining in the Pacific
Solar imaginaries
Extractive temporalities in the making of a green sacrifice zone
Energy, Place, and Space
A powerless alternative? Citizen participation, private actors, and corporate dominance in the contested rollout of renewable energy communities in Portugal
Repurposing mines for renewable energy
The dawn of solar photovoltaics
Power Shift
Fighting depopulation in Portugal
Solar photovoltaic energy infrastructures, land use and sociocultural context in Portugal
Volunteers, Nimbys, and Environmental Justice
Green Justification and Environmental Movements
Forms of valuing nature
Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology
Land sovereignty in depressed and contested agro-territories
Towards a Pragmatic and Pluralist Framework for Energy Justice
For Public Sociology
The Fate of 'Backwardness'
Energy justice
Movements shaping climate futures
Voicing concern and difference
Engagements, grammars, and the public
The dark side of the energy transition
Embodied energy injustices
Green growth for whom, how and why? The REPowerEU Plan and the inconsistencies of European Union energy policy
The value of social conflicts. Critiquing invited participation in energy projects
Energy justifications – Legitimizing Norwegian wind power development in critical moments
Renewable energy for whom? A global systematic review of the environmental justice implications of renewable energy technologies
People of the sun
Community perceptions of renewable energies in Portugal
Research on the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies
Embodied energy injustice and the political ecology of solar power
Environmental justice and the expanding geography of wind power conflicts
The Global Environmental Justice Atlas (EJAtlas)
More dams, more violence? A global analysis on resistances and repression around conflictive dams through co-produced knowledge
A perspective on radical transformations to sustainability
Ecological distribution conflicts and sustainability
The business of rapid transition
Theorising the Political Economy of Energy Transformations
Dialogues with the absent Other
Rural communities’ energy metabolisms in Portugal
Making Space for Wind Farms
Emptying the future
Anglo-Saxon and German approaches to neoliberalism and environmental policy
The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions
Neoliberal energy transitions
Participation in Transition(s)
Imagined communities
Equality, Luck and Hierarchy
Framing and social movements
Between improvement and sacrifice
(Counter)mapping renewables
Re-visiting Nimby
Picturing Urban Green Attachments
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 7 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |