Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cross-cultural attitudes toward generative AI in Art

Implications for sustainable creativity in the U.S., Japan, and China

Bibliographic Data

ID7397266
AuthorsSuomiya Bao (0000-0002-5127-5034, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume10
Pages100929-100929
Publication date2025-07-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSustainable Futures (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2666-1888
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100929
OpenAlexW4411991934
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited24

This study investigates the perceptions and attitudes toward generative AI art across three major global economies: the United States, Japan, and China. As leaders in AI development, these countries exhibit distinct viewpoints regarding the integration of AI into the creative process. The investigation was conducted using an online questionnaire, which gathered responses from participants in the three countries. The survey consisted of questions that assessed participants’ experiences with AI tools, their views on AI-generated art in various forms, and their ethical concerns regarding its use. The results indicate that participants in China are generally more optimistic about the value of AI-generated art, prioritizing the quality of the final product over ethical concerns. In contrast, participants in the U.S. and Japan emphasize the importance of human creativity and express skepticism about AI art, primarily due to ethical concerns such as misinformation and intellectual property issues. While Chinese participants focus on data privacy and intellectual property protection, U.S. participants are more concerned with misinformation and fake content. Japan, despite having the least experience with AI tools, presents attitudes that often fall between the positions of the U.S. and China. This study provides valuable insights into cross-cultural differences in attitudes toward AI art, offering guidance for educators, policymakers, and AI developers on integrating AI into the art and design sectors in a sustainable, ethical, and culturally adaptive manner

China · Creativity · Generative grammar · Linguistics · Political science · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Creativity in Education and Neuroscience · Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Multi-Agent Artificial Intelligence in Art and Culture

    Open Access•Sailaja Sankar Kanungo, Soumya Samarpita et al.•ShodhKosh: Journal of Visual and…•2026

  • Students’ voices on generative AI

    Open Access•Cecilia K Y Chan, Wenjie Hu•International Journal of…•2023

  • Cultural differences in responses to a likert scale

    Open Access•Jerry W Lee, Patricia S Jones et al.•Research in Nursing & Health•2002

  • China’s Artificial Intelligence Innovation

    Open Access•Jinghan Zeng•Global Policy•2021

  • Robots are friends as well as foes

    Open Access•Jianning Dang, Li Liu et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • Investigating American and Chinese Subjects’ explicit and implicit perceptions of AI-Generated artistic work

    Open Access•Yuheng Wu, Y Mou et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2020

  • Artificial intelligence Elsi score for science and technology

    Open Access•Tilman Hartwig, Yuko Ikkatai et al.•AI & Society•2023

  • The Chinese approach to artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Huw Roberts, Josh Cowls et al.•AI & Society•2021

  • The relationship between the attitudes of the use of AI and diversity awareness

    Open Access•Yuko Ikkatai, Yuko Itatsu et al.•AI & Society•2025

  • A Critique of China's Utilitarian View of Science and Technology

    Open Access•Xiaobai Shen, Robn Williams et al.•Science Technology and Society•2005

  • Before the Emergence of Critical Citizens

    Zhengxu Wang•International Review of Sociology•2005

  • AI as an Artist? A Two-Wave Survey Study on Attitudes Toward Using Artificial Intelligence in Art

    Open Access•Rita Latikka, Jenna Bergdahl et al.•Poetics•2023

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae