Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Structure Matters

The Impact of Court Structure on the Indian and U.S. Supreme Courts

Bibliographic Data

ID7400063
AuthorsNick Robinson (0000-0003-2283-3022, corresponding author)
Year2012
Volume61
Issue1
Pages173-208
Publication date2012-10-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe American Journal of Comparative Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-919X • E-ISSN: 2326-9197
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5131/ajcl.2012.0014
OpenAlexW2128926178
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited20

The United States Supreme Court sits as a unified bench of nine justices. The Indian Supreme Court sits in panels, and can have up to thirty-one judges. This article uses the divergent structures of the U.S. and Indian Supreme Courts to explore how specific court structures are adopted to promote different values or understandings of what a supreme court should be. It analyzes how structure impacts: (1) access to these courts; (2) the cohesiveness of the doctrine they produce; (3) inter-judge relations; and (4) perceptions about these courts, including perceived politicization. It argues a comparative analysis of court structure can challenge common assumptions about the ideal role of a court, as well as aid in judicial institutional design and reform. Such an analysis helps make explicit how law is permeated by the structure of the courts that interpret it

Certiorari · Court of record · Doctrine · Majority opinion · Original jurisdiction · Political science · Precedent · Supreme court · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Legal Education and Practice Innovations

  • Expressive Conduct and Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution

    Open Access•Raghav Kohli•Asian Journal of Comparative Law•2021

  • Judicial panel selection and strategic behaviour in the Indian Supreme Court

    Open Access•Madhav S Aney, Madhav Aney et al.•International Review of Law and…•2026

  • Institutional Design and the Predictability of Judicial Interruptions at Oral Argument

    Open Access•Tonja Jacobi, Patrick Leslie et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Ideological influences on governance and regulation

    Open Access•Keren Weinshall, Udi Sommer et al.•Regulation & Governance•2018

  • Just Hindus

    Open Access•Deepa Das Acevedo•Law & Social Inquiry•2020

  • The Universality, Peculiarity, and Sustainability of Indian Public Interest Litigation Reconsidered

    Open Access•Hajime Sato•World Development•2017

  • Nuclear Energy Safety, Regulatory Independence, and Judicial Deference

    Open Access•M P Ram Mohan, K V Gopakumar et al.•Administration & Society•2020

  • From Mythic Saviours to #MeToo at the Indian Supreme Court

    Open Access•Deepa Das Acevedo•Asian Journal of Law and Society•2021

  • Rule by Law

    Tom Ginsburg, Tamir Moustafa•Rule by Law•2008

  • The New Separation of Powers

    Bruce Ackerman•Harvard Law Review•2000

  • The Forms and Limits of Adjudication

    Lon L Fuller, Kenneth I Winston et al.•Harvard Law Review•1978

  • The Inevitable Globalization of Constitutional Law

    Open Access•Mark Tushnet, Mark V Tushnet•SSRN Electronic Journal•2008

  • Unpacking the Court

    Jonathan Turley•Perspectives on Political Science•2004

  • Justice Lewis F. Powell

    Janet L Blasecki•The Journal of Politics•1990

  • The Political Economy of Benefits and Costs

    Barry R Weingast, Kenneth A Shepsle et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1981

  • The Minutes of the Supreme Court of the United States 1789-1806

    Erwin C Surrency, Sam Bayard Clk et al.•American Journal of Legal History•1961

  • Leadership and Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Stacia L Haynie•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • On the Mysterious Demise of Consensual Norms in the United States Supreme Court

    Thomas G Walker, Tom Walker et al.•The Journal of Politics•1988

  • The size of national assemblies

    Open Access•Rein Taagepera•Social Science Research•1972

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,89
Citation span2017 - 2026 (10)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae