The most unique discussion of the 21st century? The debate on the Anthropocene pictured in seven points
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7400235 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ewa Bińczyk (0000-0002-8945-1371, Nicolaus Copernicus University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 3-18 |
| Publication date | 2019-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Anthropocene Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-0196 • E-ISSN: 2053-020X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2053019619848215 |
| OpenAlex | W2945807151 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 52 |
Nineteen years after Stoermer’s and Crutzen’s proposal, the article poses questions regarding the sources of the captivating uniqueness dwelling in the idea of the Anthropocene and in the debate surrounding it. The distinctiveness of the Anthropocene debate is elucidated in seven points. These points discuss: (1) a shocking confrontation of timeframes, (2) the drama surrounding the risk of losing the future, (3) a bold reinterpretation of the basic philosophical concepts, (4) the unification of different disciplines around a common research agenda, (5) the central problem of irreversibility, (6) the eschatological dimension of the debate, (7) the vision of the debate as a warning and a catalyst for political change
Aesthetics · Anthropocene · Art · Dimension (graph theory · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Optimal distinctiveness theory · Perspective (graphical · Political science · Politics · Reinterpretation · Sociology · Unification · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Computer Science · Global Energy and Sustainability Research · History · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Jaka sprawiedliwość w epoce antropocenu? Wstępne rozstrzygnięcia i wybrane trudności
Mediated Landscapes
Practicing for Death in the Anthropocene
Trajectories of the Anthropocene as a boundary concept bridging debates about climate change and ecological collapse (years 2000–2019)
"Jakiej refleksji potrzebujemy w epoce antropocenu? „Gramatyka" wystudzania wzrostu ekonomii ekologicznej
What does it mean that all is aflame? Non-axial Buddhist inspiration for an Anthropocene ontology
Ecological politics in an age of risk
Climate Change and the Course of Global History
The Bridge at the Edge of the World
The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis
Are we now living in the Anthropocene
A Perfect Moral Storm
A safe operating space for humanity
Critical design, hybrid labor, just transitions
Alain Badiou
The Metamorphosis of the World
The Vanishing Face of Gaia
Facing the Anthropocene
The Anthropocene
The Collapse of Western Civilization
The Anthropocene
When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal
The Anthropocene and the Environmental Humanities
Anthropocene Time
The Anthropocene as rupture
Ethics in the Anthropocene
Framing the Anthropocene
The trajectory of the Anthropocene
Anthropocene Futures
Beyond the Anthropocene
Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene
Unruly Edges
Governing the Anthropocene
Apocalypse Forever
The Climate of History
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2024 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |