Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Symbolic versus Policy Representation on the U.S. Supreme Court

Bibliographic Data

ID7409299
AuthorsThomas R Marshall (The University of Texas at Arlington, corresponding author)
Year1993
Volume55
Issue1
Pages140-150
Publication date1993-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3816 • E-ISSN: 1468-2508
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.2307/2132232
OpenAlexW2043782858
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited9

Presidents often pick Supreme Court justices at least in part for their symbolic appeal to geographic, sex, racial, religious, or partisan groups. Whether these symbolic appointees actually represent group attitudes particularly well during their tenure on the Court, however, has not yet been examined. Evidence from 107 rulings during the Warren, Burger, and Rehnquist Courts indicates that most symbolic appointees to the Courts do not vote for their own group's attitudes on specific Court cases any more often than do their remaining brethren. Symbolic appointees have not typically been "faithful delegates

Appeal · Political science · Politics · Representation (politics · Supreme court · The Symbolic · Academic Freedom and Politics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology

  • The Big Five and Southern Legislative Distinctiveness

    Open Access•Joel Turner, Joel F Turner et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2019

  • Representative Decision Making on the Federal Bench

    Open Access•Jennifer A Segal•Political Research Quarterly•2000

  • The symbolic uses of politics

    Murray J Edelman•The symbolic uses of politics•1964

  • American Public Opinion

    Robert S Erikson, Robert Erikson et al.•American Public Opinion•2015

  • Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

    Open Access•C Neal Tate•American Political Science Review•1981

  • Social Backgrounds and Judicial Decisions

    Joel B Grossman•The Journal of Politics•1967

  • Party politics in America

    Marjorie Randon Hershey, Paul A Beck•Party politics in America•2015

  • Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916-88

    C Neal Tate, Roger Handberg•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • Are Social Background Models Time-Bound

    Open Access•Sidney Ulmer, S Sidney Ulmer•American Political Science Review•1986

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,08
Citation span2000 - 2019 (20)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae