Polarized Mass or Polarized Few? Assessing the Parallel Rise of Survey Nonresponse and Measures of Polarization
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7409602 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amnon Cavari (0000-0002-1987-861X, Reichman University), Guy Freedman (0000-0001-6844-8125, Reichman University) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 80 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 719-725 |
| Publication date | 2018-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3816 • E-ISSN: 1468-2508 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/695853 |
| OpenAlex | W2793565747 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 20 |
In this study, we argue that the perceived polarization of Americans along party lines is partially an artifact of the low response rates that characterize contemporary surveys. People who agree to participate in opinion surveys are more informed, involved, and opinionated about the political process and therefore hold stronger, more meaningful, and partisan political attitudes. This motivational discrepancy generates a bias in survey research that may amplify evidence of party polarization in the mass public. We test the association between response rates and measures of polarization using individual-level data from Pew surveys from 2004 to 2014 and American National Election Studies from 1984 to 2012. Our empirical evidence demonstrates a significant decline in unit response that is associated with an increase in the percentage of politically active, partisan, and polarized individuals in these surveys. This produces evidence of dissensus that, on some issues, may be stronger than exists in reality
Demographic economics · Economics · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political science · Politics · Public opinion · Statistics · Survey data collection · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Measuring affective polarization
A graphical theory of social license
How (many) descriptive claims about political polarization exacerbate polarization
Selective Exposure to Public Service News over Thirty Years
The Impact of Survey Mode on the Measurement of Polarization in the Public
Global public opinion toward Israel
Regularized Regression Can Reintroduce Backdoor Confounding
Survey Nonresponse and Mass Polarization
Correlation with Time Explains the Relationship between Survey Nonresponse and Mass Polarization
Polarization and Partisan Bias in Citizens’ Evaluations of Public Services
Deliberative democracy in contemporary political parties
Who Wants to Know? White Racial Attitudes and Survey Item Refusal on Gun Ownership Questions
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
The Partisan Sort
The Disappearing Center
On party polarization in Congress
The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate
Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys
Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization
Policy Polarization among Party Elites and the Significance of Political Awareness in the Mass Public
The Rise of Partisanship and the Expansion of Partisan Conflict within the American Electorate
Shot by the Messenger
Voter Turnout and the National Election Studies
Polarizing Cues
Learning and Opinion Change, Not Priming
War and the Inner Circle
Political Polarization in the American Public
Transformation and polarization
Resurgent Mass Partisanship
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,71 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |