Soviet Perceptions of U.S. “Positions-of-Strength” Diplomacy in the 1970s
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7424099 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William B Husband (Princeton University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1979 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 495-517 |
| Publication date | 1979-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | World Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0043-8871 • E-ISSN: 1086-3338 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2009907 |
| OpenAlex | W2127234755 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 2 |
Soviet political scholars have argued that, since 1970, it has become impossible for the United States to pursue a “positions-of-strength” foreign policy effectively. These analysts feel that in the past, the U.S. has relied heavily on projecting its military strength in diplomatic affairs, and that changes in the international political and economic order now prevent the continuation of this policy. A study of the positions-ofstrength issue in Soviet scholarly journals reveals that Soviet scholars do not agree on how the United States will react to this development. While the majority contends that the U.S. will try to regain its ability to pursue positions-of-strength diplomacy, a significant minority believes that the time is right for a deepening of Soviet-American cooperation. Although the prospects for cooperation appear less promising at present than they did during 1972–1975, the study shows a general softening on the subject of cooperation since 1970
Diplomacy · Economics · Foreign policy · International relations · Order (exchange · Perception · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Subject (documents · Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Nuclear Issues and Defense · Psychology
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,07 |
| Citation span | 1980 - 1983 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |