Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Response-abilities of care in more-than-human worlds

Bibliographic Data

ID7424820
AuthorsMarie-Catherine Petersmann (0000-0001-5665-0211, Tilburg University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume12
Issue0
Pages102-124
Publication date2021-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Human Rights and the Environment (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1759-7188 • E-ISSN: 1759-7196
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.4337/jhre.2021.00.05
OpenAlexW4205663349
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited1

This article rethinks the doctrines of responsibility and protection in international environmental law in light of notions of response-abilities and care in more-than-human worlds. Inspired by the intersecting strands of new materialist, relational and posthuman literatures, and informed by critiques of them by decolonial, indigenous and black scholars, the analysis works with onto-epistemologies of becoming that posit an inseparability of being, knowing and acting with(in) the Anthropocene/s. Through the notion of response-abilities of care, the article reconfigures how the destructive and the restorative relations between humans and nonhumans could be construed beyond a narrow understanding of state sovereignty, territorial jurisdiction, liberal human-centred notions of individuated agency and the strict causal nexus between victim and perpetrator. The analysis concludes by reflecting on how law could remain open to emergent, unfolding and contingent potentialities of entangled human-nonhuman relations, and questions law’s capacity to recognize and respond to the agency and alterity of nonhumans. These configurations exceed the schema of responsibility and protection that organizes even international environmental law’s most progressive theories and practices, such as granting ‘rights to nature

Anthropocene · Anthropocentrism · Materialism · Posthuman · Environmental law and policy · Water Governance and Infrastructure · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses

  • The ‘question of possibilities’ as a leitmotif for re‐imagining law for the ‘Anthropocene’

    Open Access•Laura Mai•Global Policy•2022

  • On phantom publics, clusters, and collectives

    Open Access•Marie-Catherine Petersmann, Marie Petersmann et al.•AI & Society•2024

  • Making kin with more-than-human rights

    Open Access•Kate Seear, Sean Mulcahy•International Journal of Drug…•2024

  • Drug law is a multispecies concern

    Open Access•Kate Seear•International Journal of Drug…•2026

  • Earth system law

    Open Access•Louis J Kotzé, Richard E Kim et al.•Earth System Governance•2021

  • Seeking ‘Systems’ in Earth System Law

    Open Access•Michael C Leach•Earth System Governance•2023

  • Futurism

    Rebecca Mignot-Mahdavi•Journal of the History of…•2025

  • Virtual Borders

    Open Access•Dimitri Van Den Meerssche•European Journal of International…•2022

  • Good Science from Below

    Open Access•Florentine Frantz•Minerva•2025

  • Immanent obligations of response

    Open Access•Lydia Baan Hofman•Distinktion Journal of Social…•2023

Unique citing works10
Citations per year2
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae