The unbelieved and historians, part III

Responses and elaborations

Datos Bibliográficos

ID7436637
AutoresRoland Clark (0000-0003-3292-282X, University of Liverpool, autor de correspondencia), Luke Clossey (0000-0002-8920-7387, Simon Fraser University), Simon Ditchfield (0000-0003-1691-0271, University of York), David Gordon (0000-0002-9557-7405, Bowdoin College), Arlen Wiesenthal (0009-0006-7497-3085, University of Chicago), Taymiya R Zaman (University of San Francisco)
Año2017
Volumen15
Número12
Fecha de publicación2017-11-08
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaHistory Compass (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1478-0542 • E-ISSN: 1478-0542
EditorialWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/hic3.12430
OpenAlexW2767755025
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas17

The first two parts of "The Unbelieved" argued for the possibility of the existence of supernatural beings and for their agency in historical writing. This instalment is a roundtable assessing the problems and potential in the category of the Unbelieved and in its knowability. Space limitations prevented our following the rich avenues of further inquiry our extraordinary peer reviewers suggested, but we remain grateful, especially for their reminders of the complexity of motivations of historians who avoid the Unbelieved and their emphasis on the importance of humility as a historian's tool

Humility · Christian Theology and Mission · Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies · Theological Perspectives and Practices