The pluralism of river rights in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Colombia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7440376 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Elizabeth Macpherson (0000-0003-1021-9930, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile), Felipe Clavijo Ospina (Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-06 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | PREPRINT |
| Publisher | Center for Open Science (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.31235/osf.io/rdh4x |
| OpenAlex | W3172290392 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
In this article we interrogate the recognition of rivers as legal persons in Aotearoa New Zealand (Whanganui River) and Colombia (Ri'o Atrato). Although the legal, political, historical and cultural context for recognition is different in each country, an analysis of the cases presents some interesting conceptual correlations, which help us to understand this emerging (and sometimes controversial) transnational idea that a river can be a person. In both cases recognising that the river is a person is an attempt to accommodate diverse legal and cultural interests in the river, in order to establish a new collaborative relationship between the state and river communities. Whether either model results in improved river outcomes, or increased indigenous or community jurisdiction to govern, turns not on the fiction that the river is a person but on the surrounding institutional framework, which has been carefully designed to engender enforceability. Thus, we argue, traditional dichotomies that draw lines between human-centred and earth-centred laws, or nature as the object versus the subject of property or rights fail to capture what legal personality entails. Ahora es el momento de comenzar a to mar las primeras medidas para proteger de forma eficaz al planeta y a sus recursos antes de que sea demasiado tarde o el dano sea irreversible, no solo para las futuras generaciones sino para la especie humana.2 Now is the moment to begin to take the first steps effectively to protect the planet and its resources before it is too late or the damage is irreversible, not just for future generations but for the human species. This is the author-produced PDF of an article, accepted for publication in [Journal of Water Law], following peer review. The Version of Record [Macpherson, E. & Ospina, F.C. 2015, "The pluralism of river rights in Aotearoa, New Zealand and Colombia", Journal of Water Law, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 283-293] is available in [Journal of Water Law, vol 25, issue 6 at 283-293]. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0
Aotearoa · Indigenous rights · Personhood · Environmental law and policy · International Environmental Law and Policies · Water Governance and Infrastructure
Cuando la ley se queda corta
Glossary
Who Benefits from Multispecies Justice
Stop Burying the Lede
El Atrato y sus guardianes
Plural values of nature help to understand contested pathways to sustainability
Mejorar los conflictos
Territories of life as key to global environmental sustainability
Comparative analysis of Rights of Nature (RoN) case studies worldwide
Struggling for the recognition of river rights
Constitutional Law, Ecosystems, and Indigenous Peoples in Colombia
Towards a legal toolkit for disaster resilience and transformation
Aotearoa's Western governance structure
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,17 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2024 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |