From disruptive protests to disrupted news frames
Comparing German news on climate protests
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7477435 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Helmut Meyer (0009-0002-7741-0537, Universität Hamburg, corresponding author), Mike Farjam (0000-0002-0882-4851, Universität Hamburg), Helena Rauxloh (0009-0009-5120-9473, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences), Michael Brüggemann (0000-0001-7994-3914, Universität Hamburg) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journalism (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1464-8849 • E-ISSN: 1741-3001 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14648849251372805 |
| OpenAlex | W4413873273 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 23 |
This paper examines how news frames on disruptive climate protests differ from coverage of conventional protests in news outlets with different political leanings. Analyzing 6632 articles from 21 ideologically diverse German news sources between January 2022 and May 2023, we apply Word2Vec for semantic mapping, emotion classifiers, and qualitative evaluations to assess the frames present in the coverage of climate movements, and the anger attached to these frames. Comparing the more disruptive protests of the group “The Last Generation” and the more conventional protest movement “Fridays for Future”, we find that coverage of “Fridays for Future” varies predictably across the ideological spectrum: Right-wing outlets present protesters as extreme or criminal, while other outlets make reference to climate justice within their coverage of the protests, thereby following the movement’s own framing. When covering the more disruptive “Last Generation”, the entire news landscape engages in an emotionally-charged debate, asking whether the protesters are extremists or criminals, while barely discussing their actual demands. Amid an increasingly affectively polarized media debate on disruptive climate protests, left- and right-wing media remain divided in their evaluations of the protests, but focus on criminality and extremism rather than climate justice. The findings should serve as a reminder to journalists of their responsibility to carefully reflect the frames through which they cover protest movements
Advertising · Business · German · Media studies · News media · Political science · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Media Studies and Communication · Social Media and Politics · History · Law
Fridays for Future im Spiegel der Medienöffentlichkeit
News framing
Shifting the protest paradigm? Legitimizing and humanizing protest coverage lead to more positive attitudes toward protest, mixed results on news credibility
Unveiling the Backlash in Public Opinion on Climate Change
The role of (social) media in political polarization
Contextualizing Representations of Violence in #Blacklivesmatter Coverage with Inductive Computational Content Analysis
When debates break apart
The Manufacture of `Public Opinion' by Reporters
Rebel with a cause
Between Frame Setting and Frame Sending
Election Night’s Alright for Fighting
No Reckoning for the Right
The Impact of Media Framing in Complex Information Environments
Disrupting the system constructively
Black Radicalization and the Funding of Civil Rights
From Disruptive Protests to Disrupted Networks? Analyzing Levels of Polarization in the German Twitter/X Debates on 'Fridays for Future' and 'Letzte Generation
Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |