Shaping the perception of African conflicts through framing

A case study of the African diasporic press in the UK

Bibliographic Data

ID7500375
AuthorsOla Ogunyemi (0000-0003-2469-0299, University of Lincoln, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume11
Issue4
Pages421-433
Publication date2018-11-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedia War & Conflict (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1750-6352 • E-ISSN: 1750-6360
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1750635218779918
OpenAlexW2901002645
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited20

Framing studies consistently conclude that the international news media represent African conflicts negatively and stereotypically. Owing to their focus on media content, however, most framing studies fail to examine the dynamic relationship between journalists’ cognitive role (what they say they do) and their practice role (what they actually do). Using parallel content analysis, this study compares what African diaspora journalists write about African conflicts with what they say about them. The analysis reveals that they show a preference for a factual style and a governing frame, and less preference for a judgmental style, which aligns with what they say, and a slight preference for background context which marginally aligns with what they say. However, low newsroom budgets and advertising revenue could undermine their attempts to de-Westernize the portrayal of African conflicts

Content analysis · Diaspora · Economics · Framing (construction · Media studies · Perception · Political science · Preference · Social science · Sociology · Gender Studies · Gender, Feminism, and Media · History · Media Studies and Communication · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access