How far does Twitter deepen democracy through public engagement
An analysis of journalists’ use of Twitter in the Johannesburg newsroom
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7513564 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Glenda Daniels (Wits Journalism), Glenda Daniels (0000-0001-5150-5971, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 299-311 |
| Publication date | 2014-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of African Media Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1751-7974 • E-ISSN: 2040-199X |
| Publisher | Intellect (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1386/jams.6.3.299_1 |
| OpenAlex | W1995750864 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
The use of social media, mainly Twitter, in the Johannesburg newsroom presents an opportunity for the opening up of media spaces to public engagement, thereby deepening democracy. This article, framed through radical democratic theory, is a scrutiny of journalists’ use of Twitter. The article deploys multidimensional methods against a theoretical conceptual approach. It uses a content analysis of Twitter feeds, discourse analysis, as well as interviews with journalists and editors to reach some reflective insights. The issues include the following: there is much ‘noise’ about, and within, Twitter in the newsroom but does this robust public engagement engage more voices, and therefore diversity, into the public sphere of journalism? Or could the world of Twitter in the newsroom, at this present moment, exist as a mainly consensus seeking one – that of the like-minded merely re-affirming each other’s views? The argument here, which is open for debate, is that Twitter presents an opportunity to deepen democracy, but at this moment it is limited, as the data gathered from newsrooms in Johannesburg show
Argument (complex analysis · Democracy · Diversity (politics · Journalism · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Public sphere · Scrutiny · Social media · Sociology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Media Studies and Communication · Social Media and Politics · Law
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2023 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |