Interlocking among American Newspaper Organizations Revisited
Pressure from the Top” and Its Influence on Newsroom and Content
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 7513655 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Adam J Saffer (0000-0001-8032-4256, University of Minnesota, autor de correspondencia), Deborah L Dwyer (0000-0002-0839-0264, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Jennifer L Harker (0000-0002-0483-5465, West Virginia University), Christopher E Etheridge (0000-0002-0739-6410, University of Kansas), Mariam Turner (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill), Daniel Riffe (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 24 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 441-469 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-12-27 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Mass Communication & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1520-5436 • E-ISSN: 1532-7825 |
| Editorial | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/15205436.2020.1868523 |
| OpenAlex | W3116304761 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 45 |
Today’s media companies seem to be more intertwined than ever. But are they? Do these “interlocks” affect editors and the content journalists produce? This study uses a three-method design to examine the connections among newspaper organizations and corporations. The network analysis examined the interlocks among newspaper companies’ directors. The second phase surveyed editors of newspapers owned by these companies to assess the influence on the newsroom from the board and parent company. In the third phase, news coverage of directors and their affiliated organizations was content analyzed for newspapers whose editors perceived pressure “from above.” The network analysis results suggest a monolithic interlocking structure that previous scholars feared. For one-third of survey respondents, corporate parents and the boardroom were seen as influencing the newsroom. These “pressured editors” perceived significantly stronger pressures from the boardroom, “ownership/upper management,” and business interests than editors who did not indicate pressure from above. So, how did pressured newsrooms cover ownership and directors? Routine coverage of directors and their affiliated organizations was lacking. Disclosure of a relationship between a director or affiliated organization and the newspaper was disclosed half of the time and traditional journalistic scrutiny was applied less than half of the time
Advertising · Business · Content analysis · Newspaper · Political science · Public relations · Scrutiny · Social science · Sociology · Media Influence and Politics · Media Studies and Communication · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Law
Mediating the Message in the 21st Century
The wall becomes a curtain
Factors affecting response rates of the web survey
Who Owns the World's Media
Democracy without Journalism
Critical Political Economy of the Media
Determinants of Journalists' Professional Autonomy
Does Media Cross-Ownership Translate into Cross-Promotion
Corporate Ownership and News Bias
Corporate Ownership and News Bias Revisited
The Weekly Newspaper's Leadership Role as Seen by Community Leaders
Audience evolution
Modeling Perceived Influences on Journalism
Mind the Gap
The Measurement of Journalistic Role Enactments
The murky ownership of the journalistic enterprise
Reliability of Content Analysis
What is journalism
The Iron Cage Revisited
Social Control in the Newsroom
What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates
Objectivity as Strategic Ritual
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |