Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Systemic barriers and untapped potentials

A SWOT study on the implementation of natural/small water retention measures in Europe

Bibliographic Data

ID7515015
AuthorsJulia Szulecka (0000-0001-5621-8832), Ingrid Nesheim (0000-0003-0200-4411), Federica Monaco (0000-0002-5986-3594), Anne-Grete Buseth Blankenberg (0000-0001-5503-5508), Veronika Čápová, Natalja Čerkasova, Jovita Mėžinė, Joana Eichenberger, Kinga Farkas-Iványi, Kinga Farkas‐Iványi, Marie Anne Eurie Forio (0000-0001-6675-4751), Petr Fučík (0000-0002-5763-8748), Martyn N Futter (0000-0002-9789-7138), Marek Giełczewski (0000-0003-1246-4489), Wiesława Kasperska-Wołowicz (0000-0001-8265-8786), Piroska Kassai, Gregor Kramberger, Dominika Krzeminska (0000-0002-4647-4928), Tatenda Lemann (0000-0001-5507-1285), Michael Strauch (0000-0002-9872-6904), Brigitta Szabó (0000-0002-2848-7274), Artūrs Škute, Felix Witing (0000-0002-7314-4908), Antonín Zajíček (0000-0002-5977-6108)
Year2026
Volume124
Pages104099
Publication date2026-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Rural Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0743-0167 • E-ISSN: 1873-1392
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104099
OpenAlexW7133481636
LanguageEN
References cited52

There is strong evidence that ecosystem-based approaches, such as Natural/Small Water Retention Measures (NSWRMs) can be an important solution to problems associated with managing water quality and quantity, soil erosion, and nutrient loss. Moreover, they deliver multiple co-benefits such as increased biodiversity, climate change adaptation and mitigation, alongside aesthetic and recreational functions. However, despite their apparent advantages and significant political momentum for their expanded deployment, implementation of NSWRMs remains slow. This study asks why this is the case and employs a methodologically rigorous variant of the SWOT framework combining qualitative and quantitative (scoring and cluster analysis) elements to assess the exact barriers and potentials for increasing the NSWRMs’ implementation across Europe. The empirical analysis draws on case studies of fourteen small watersheds distributed across twelve European countries to explore the factors affecting the NSWRMs adoption, evaluate their relative importance, and identify necessary intervention areas for their better uptake. Our findings indicate that the main drivers for NSWRMs implementation are high knowledge availability through formal and informal networks, as well as support through advisory services. On the other hand, the main hindrances are inadequate financing schemes but also uncertain societal attitudes and perceptions. Financing schemes rarely account for indirect costs, and bureaucratic procedures further discourage practitioners from pursuing these measures. Negative attitudes are linked to mismatched time horizons as well as the gap between theoretical benefits and practical implementation challenges

SWOT Analysis · Water industry · Water resources · Water retention · Water sector · Strategic Planning and Analysis · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Water Resources and Sustainability

  • Stakeholders’ Engagement on Nature-Based Solutions

    Open Access•Vera Ferreira, Ana Barreira et al.•Sustainability•2020

  • Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now?

    Open Access•Marilyn M Helms, Judy Nixon•Journal of Strategy and Management•2010

  • The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions

    Open Access•Carsten Neßhöver, Timo Assmuth et al.•The Science of The Total…•2017

  • Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges

    Open Access•Nathalie Seddon, Alexandre M Chausson et al.•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2020

  • Costs and benefits of landscape‐based water retention measures as nature‐based solutions to mitigating climate impacts in eastern Germany, Czech Republic, and Slovakia

    Open Access•Janez Sušnik, Sara Masia et al.•Land Degradation and Development•2022

  • Across the Great Divide

    Open Access•Estefania Arteaga, Robbert Biesbroek et al.•SAGE Open•2024

  • Factors affecting farmers' willingness to participate in eutrophication mitigation — A case study of preferences for wetland creation in Sweden

    Open Access•Frida Franzén, Patrik Dinnétz et al.•Ecological Economics•2016

  • A review of public acceptance of nature-based solutions

    Open Access•Carl C Anderson, Fabrice G Renaud•AMBIO•2021

  • Legitimizing farmers' new knowledge, learning and practices through communicative action

    Open Access•Jean-Pierre Del Corso, Charilaos Képhaliacos et al.•Ecological Economics•2015

  • Forest plantations in Paraguay

    Open Access•Julia Szulecka, Elizabeth Monges Zalazar•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Simplistic understandings of farmer motivations could undermine the environmental potential of the common agricultural policy

    Open Access•Calum Brown, Eszter Krasznai Kovacs et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Opportunities and limitations for Nature-Based Solutions in EU policies – Assessed with a focus on ponds and pondscapes

    Open Access•Simon Ryfisch, Isabel Seeger et al.•Land Use Policy•2023

  • Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden – historical lessons and emerging issues

    Open Access•Morten Graversgaard, Brian H Jacobsen et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis and the environment

    Open Access•Tadhg O’Mahony, Tadhg O'Mahony•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2021

  • The Effect of Administrative Burden on Farmers’ Perceptions of Cross‐Compliance‐Based Direct Payment Policy

    Open Access•Gabriele Mack, Christian Ritzel et al.•Public Administration Review•2020

  • The effect of international environmental institutions

    Open Access•Thomas Bernauer•International Organization•1995

  • The everyday work of farm advisors as interface bureaucrats in greening French agricultural policies

    Open Access•Floriane Clement, Pierre Labarthe et al.•Journal of Political Ecology•2024

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae