Systemic barriers and untapped potentials
A SWOT study on the implementation of natural/small water retention measures in Europe
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7515015 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Julia Szulecka (0000-0001-5621-8832), Ingrid Nesheim (0000-0003-0200-4411), Federica Monaco (0000-0002-5986-3594), Anne-Grete Buseth Blankenberg (0000-0001-5503-5508), Veronika Čápová, Natalja Čerkasova, Jovita Mėžinė, Joana Eichenberger, Kinga Farkas-Iványi, Kinga Farkas‐Iványi, Marie Anne Eurie Forio (0000-0001-6675-4751), Petr Fučík (0000-0002-5763-8748), Martyn N Futter (0000-0002-9789-7138), Marek Giełczewski (0000-0003-1246-4489), Wiesława Kasperska-Wołowicz (0000-0001-8265-8786), Piroska Kassai, Gregor Kramberger, Dominika Krzeminska (0000-0002-4647-4928), Tatenda Lemann (0000-0001-5507-1285), Michael Strauch (0000-0002-9872-6904), Brigitta Szabó (0000-0002-2848-7274), Artūrs Škute, Felix Witing (0000-0002-7314-4908), Antonín Zajíček (0000-0002-5977-6108) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 124 |
| Pages | 104099 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Rural Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0743-0167 • E-ISSN: 1873-1392 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104099 |
| OpenAlex | W7133481636 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 52 |
There is strong evidence that ecosystem-based approaches, such as Natural/Small Water Retention Measures (NSWRMs) can be an important solution to problems associated with managing water quality and quantity, soil erosion, and nutrient loss. Moreover, they deliver multiple co-benefits such as increased biodiversity, climate change adaptation and mitigation, alongside aesthetic and recreational functions. However, despite their apparent advantages and significant political momentum for their expanded deployment, implementation of NSWRMs remains slow. This study asks why this is the case and employs a methodologically rigorous variant of the SWOT framework combining qualitative and quantitative (scoring and cluster analysis) elements to assess the exact barriers and potentials for increasing the NSWRMs’ implementation across Europe. The empirical analysis draws on case studies of fourteen small watersheds distributed across twelve European countries to explore the factors affecting the NSWRMs adoption, evaluate their relative importance, and identify necessary intervention areas for their better uptake. Our findings indicate that the main drivers for NSWRMs implementation are high knowledge availability through formal and informal networks, as well as support through advisory services. On the other hand, the main hindrances are inadequate financing schemes but also uncertain societal attitudes and perceptions. Financing schemes rarely account for indirect costs, and bureaucratic procedures further discourage practitioners from pursuing these measures. Negative attitudes are linked to mismatched time horizons as well as the gap between theoretical benefits and practical implementation challenges
SWOT Analysis · Water industry · Water resources · Water retention · Water sector · Strategic Planning and Analysis · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Water Resources and Sustainability
Stakeholders’ Engagement on Nature-Based Solutions
Exploring SWOT analysis – where are we now?
The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions
Understanding the value and limits of nature-based solutions to climate change and other global challenges
Costs and benefits of landscape‐based water retention measures as nature‐based solutions to mitigating climate impacts in eastern Germany, Czech Republic, and Slovakia
Across the Great Divide
Factors affecting farmers' willingness to participate in eutrophication mitigation — A case study of preferences for wetland creation in Sweden
A review of public acceptance of nature-based solutions
Legitimizing farmers' new knowledge, learning and practices through communicative action
Forest plantations in Paraguay
Simplistic understandings of farmer motivations could undermine the environmental potential of the common agricultural policy
Opportunities and limitations for Nature-Based Solutions in EU policies – Assessed with a focus on ponds and pondscapes
Policies for wetlands implementation in Denmark and Sweden – historical lessons and emerging issues
Cost-Benefit Analysis and the environment
The Effect of Administrative Burden on Farmers’ Perceptions of Cross‐Compliance‐Based Direct Payment Policy
The effect of international environmental institutions
The everyday work of farm advisors as interface bureaucrats in greening French agricultural policies
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |