Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bureaucracy and Judicial Truth in Qing Dynasty Homicide Cases

Bibliographic Data

ID7515422
AuthorsBradly W Reed (University of Virginia), Zhengyang Jiang (0000-0002-7889-7116, Beijing Institute of Technology)
Year2026
Volume23
Issue1
Pages114-143
Publication date2026-03-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRural China (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2213-6746 • E-ISSN: 2213-6738
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1163/22136746-12341344
OpenAlexW7134839637
LanguageEN

This article demonstrates how the specificity of statutes in the Qing Code combined with the bureaucratic process of case investigation, reporting, and review by superior courts to determine what could, and what could not, be accepted as valid “judicial truth” in serious cases such as homicide. Through a detailed examination of two homicide cases, both drawn from the mid-Qianlong era, the article shows how the complexity of actual circumstances could be forced into pre-existing legal categories and statutes. In both cases, the ideological intent of codified statute was thus cut short by the bureaucratic implementation of such law

Bureaucracy · Homicide · Ideology · Jurisprudence · Penal code · Statute · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Chinese history and philosophy · Historical Legal Studies and Society

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae