Pirates and poachers
Fan fiction and the conventions of reading and writing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7519035 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Margaret Mackey (0000-0001-5828-9351, University of Alberta, corresponding author), Jill McClay (University of Alberta), Jill Kedersha McClay (University of Alberta) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 131-147 |
| Publication date | 2008-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | English in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0425-0494 • E-ISSN: 1754-8845 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1754-8845.2008.00011.x |
| OpenAlex | W1963689692 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 3 |
This article explores what teachers and students can learn about contemporary story‐telling from a study of fan fiction – that is, stories created by readers and viewers out of the canonical material of previously published fictions. Drawing on the example of Pirates of the Caribbean, it investigates ways in which fan fiction writers develop codes and conventions to govern themselves. For example, online litmus tests establish when a writer is self‐indulgently writing 'Mary Sue' characters into a story; the self‐styled Protectors of the Plot Continuum patrol the fictional limits of an imagined world to make sure that canonical information is not violated by fan fiction writers. This article makes use of such examples to investigate how quality control in fan fiction is codified, and to explore what teachers can learn from such enterprises about contemporary writing, reading and viewing. It compares these possibilities with issues of online literacy outlined by Henry Jenkins under three headings: the participation gap, the transparency problem, and the ethics challenge
Art · Linguistics · Literature · Reading (process · Asian Culture and Media Studies · History · Media, Gender, and Advertising · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2014 - 2022 (9) |
| Highly cited | No |