South Korea in 2002
Multiple Political Dramas
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7519488 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hong Yung Lee (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2003 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 64-77 |
| Publication date | 2003-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Asian Survey (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-4687 • E-ISSN: 1533-838X |
| Publisher | University of California Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1525/as.2003.43.1.64 |
| OpenAlex | W2078541345 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 1 |
This article analyzes how political actors maneuvered and counter-maneuvered in South Korea in 2002, developing political strategy and exploiting national issues in order to position themselves for the presidential election of December 19, which dominated Korean politics throughout the year. Since public opinion polling conducted regularly by major news media had to a great extent shaped important decisions of all aspirants for daekwon (big power), the analysis focuses on explaining how the popularity of Lee Hoi-chang, Roh Moo-hyun, and Chung Mong-jun fluctuated, and how Roh finally won the presidential election
Economics · Media studies · Order (exchange · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Polling · Popularity · Power (physics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Public opinion · Sociology · Asian Culture and Media Studies · Law · Public Administration
Dilemmas of ‘biometric nationality’
Internet Election 2.0? Culture, Institutions, and Technology in the Korean Presidential Elections of 2002 and 2007
On Parties’ Terms
Electoral Continuity and Change in South Korea since Democratization
How Ideology Divides Generations
Deliberative Democracy, Rational Participation and e-Voting in South Korea
The Reconfiguration of E-Campaign Practices in Korea
The Lingering Effects of Losing and Nonvoting on Institutional Trust
The Tension Between Cultural Codes in South Korean Civil Society
Does the use of a biometric system guarantee an acceptable election's outcome? Evidence from Ghana's 2012 election
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2006 - 2023 (18) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |