Mandeville and Hume
Anatomists of Civil Society
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7526402 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Iain Mcdaniel (University of Sussex, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 593-594 |
| Publication date | 2013-10-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Intellectual History Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1749-6977 • E-ISSN: 1749-6985 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17496977.2013.850605 |
| OpenAlex | W2047595483 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
Many of the fiercest disagreements among the philosophers and thinkers of early eighteenth-century Britain were driven by arguments about the moral foundations of civil society. Were modern societi
Civil society · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Classics · History · Law · Legal and Social Philosophy · Philosophy
Human nature and therapeutic forms in B. Mandeville
The Pleasure of Exchange
Bernard Mandeville’s critique of Epicurus and the “easie Divines” of the Church of England, 1705–1732
Hume on Pride, Vanity and Society
Recent Work on Hume
An Authority from which there can be no appeal’
Morality and Sociability in Commercial Society
Love of Dominion in Mandeville and Smith
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,89 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |