Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Public Opinion Polarization by Individual Revenue from the Social Preference Theory

Datos Bibliográficos

ID7531489
AutoresTinggui Chen (0000-0001-6061-2517, Zhejiang Gongshang University, autor de correspondencia), Qianqian Li (0000-0002-5462-3460, Zhejiang Gongshang University), Peihua Fu (0000-0001-5150-6464, Zhejiang Gongshang University), Jianjun Yang (0000-0001-6785-9627, University of North Georgia), Chonghuan Xu (0000-0001-9757-1915, Zhejiang Gongshang University), Guodong Cong (0000-0002-9819-1508, Zhejiang Gongshang University), Gongfa Li (0000-0002-2695-2742, Wuhan University of Science and Technology)
Año2020
Volumen17
Número3
Páginas946-946
Fecha de publicación2020-02-04
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1661-7827 • E-ISSN: 1660-4601
EditorialMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3390/ijerph17030946
PMID32033012
OpenAlexW3005488972
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5
Referencias citadas37

Social conflicts occur frequently duringthe social transition period and the polarization of public opinion happens occasionally. By introducing the social preference theory, the target of this paper is to reveal the micro-interaction mechanism of public opinion polarization. Firstly, we divide the social preferences of Internet users (network nodes) into three categories: egoistic, altruistic, and fair preferences, and adopt the revenue function to define the benefits obtained by individuals with different preferences among their interaction process so as to analyze their decision-making behaviors driven by the revenue. Secondly, the revenue function is used to judge the exit rules of nodes in a network, and then a dynamic network of spreading public opinionwith the node (individual) exit mechanism is built based on a BA scale-free network. Subsequently, the influences of different social preferences,as well as individual revenue on the effect of public opinionpolarization, are analyzed through simulation experiments. The simulation results show that(1) Different social preferences demonstrate different influences on the evolution of public opinions, (2) Individuals tend to interact with ones with different preferences, (3) The network with a single preference or a high aggregation is more likely to form public opinion polarization. Finally, the practicability and effectiveness of the proposed model are verified by a real case

Economics · Microeconomics · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political science · Preference · Public opinion · Revenue · Social media · Social network (sociolinguistics · The Internet · World Wide Web · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Computer Science · Law · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Modeling misinformation herd immunity from a multi-mechanism integration perspective

    Open Access•Renbiao Yang, Yang Renbiao et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2026

  • Transitioning from Face-To-Face to Online Learning During Covid-19

    Open Access•Tao Li•Croatian Journal of Education -…•2024

  • Path Optimization of Medical Waste Transport Routes in the Emergent Public Health Event of Covid-19

    Open Access•Ziyuan Liu, Zhi Li et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Modeling Multidimensional Public Opinion Polarization Process under the Context of Derived Topics

    Open Access•Tinggui Chen, Yulong Wang et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Modeling Network Public Opinion Propagation with the Consideration of Individual Emotions

    Open Access•Peihua Fu, Bailu Jing et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization

    Open Access•Pranav Dandekar, Ashish Goel et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2013

  • Incorporating Fairness into Game Theory and Economics

    Matthew Rabin•2011

  • Micro-Level Estimation of Optimal Consumption Choice With Intertemporal Nonseparability in Preferences and Measurement Errors

    Wayne-Roy Gayle, Natalia Khorunzhina•Journal of Business and Economic…•2018

  • Risk Propagation Model and Its Simulation of Emergency Logistics Network Based on Material Reliability

    Open Access•Tinggui Chen, Shiwen Wu et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • The value of social conflicts. Critiquing invited participation in energy projects

    Open Access•Eefje Cuppen•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • The Law of Group Polarization

    Open Access•Cass R Sunstein•Journal of Political Philosophy•2002

  • Endogenous Changes in Public Opinion Dynamics

    Open Access•Francisco J León-Medina, Francisco José León Medina•Journal of Artificial Societies…•2019

  • Agent-Based Modelling Approach for Multidimensional Opinion Polarization in Collective Behaviour

    Open Access•Jin Li, Renbin Xiao•Journal of Artificial Societies…•2017

  • Opinion polarization by learning from social feedback

    Banisch, S Banisch et al.•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•2018

  • A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation

    Ernst Fehr, Kari M Schmidt•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1999

  • Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election

    Open Access•Hunt Allcott, Matthew Gentzkow•The Journal of Economic…•2017

Obras citantes distintas5
Citas por año0,83
Intervalo de citas2020 - 2026 (7)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 5
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae