Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Deliberative Exchange, Truth, and Cognitive Division of Labour

A Low-Resolution Modeling Approach

Bibliographic Data

ID7531979
AuthorsRainer Hegselmann (corresponding author), Ulrich Krause (0000-0001-8998-7646)
Year2009
Volume6
Issue2
Pages130-144
Publication date2009-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEPISTÉMÈ (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1976-9660 • E-ISSN: 1750-0117
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3366/e1742360009000604
OpenAlexW2134040170
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited14

This paper develops a formal framework to model a process in which the formation of individual opinions is embedded in a deliberative exchange with others. The paper opts for a low-resolution modeling approach and abstracts away from most of the details of the social-epistemic process. Taking a bird's eye view allows us to analyze the chances for the truth to be found and broadly accepted under conditions of cognitive division of labour combined with a social exchange process. Cognitive division of labour means that only some individuals are active truth seekers, possibly with different capacities. Both mathematical tools and computer simulations are used to investigate the model. As an analytical result, the Funnel Theorem states that under rather weak conditions on the social process, a consensus on the truth will be reached if all individuals possess an arbitrarily small capacity to go for the truth. The Leading the pack Theorem states that under certain conditions even a single truth seeker may lead all individuals to the truth. Systematic simulations analyze how close agents can get to the truth depending upon the frequency of truth seekers, their capacities as truth seekers, the position of the truth (more to the extreme or more in the centre of an opinion space), and the willingness to take into account the opinions of others when exchanging and updating opinions

Cognition · Economics · Epistemology · Funnel · Ground truth · Political science · Position (finance · Process (computing · Resolution (logic · Seekers · Computer Science · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Philosophy · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Argumentation-induced rational issue polarisation

    Open Access•Felix Kopecky•Philosophical Studies•2024

  • The Social Learnability of Natural Concepts

    Open Access•Igor Douven•Erkenntnis•2026

  • Coherence and Correspondence in the Network Dynamics of Belief Suites

    Open Access•Patrick Grim, Andrew Modell et al.•EPISTÉMÈ•2016

  • Bounded Confidence Revisited

    Open Access•Rainer Hegselmann•Journal of Artificial Societies…•2023

  • Argumentative landscapes

    Open Access•N Emrah Aydinonat, Samuli Reijula et al.•Synthese•2021

  • The ecological rationality of explanatory reasoning

    Open Access•Igor Douven•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2020

  • Inference to the Best Explanation versus Bayes’s Rule in a Social Setting

    Igor Douven, Sylvia Wenmacker et al.•The British Journal for the…•2015

  • Explaining the Success of Induction

    Igor Douven•The British Journal for the…•2021

  • Truth Approximation, Social Epistemology, and Opinion Dynamics

    Open Access•Igor Douven, Christoph Kelp•Erkenntnis•2011

  • Anchoring in Deliberations

    Open Access•Stephan Hartmann, Soroush Rafiee Rad•Erkenntnis•2019

  • Network effects in a bounded confidence model

    Open Access•Igor Douven, Rainer Hegselmann•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2022

  • Rational Consensus in Science and Society

    Open Access•Keith Lehrer, Carl Wagner•Rational Consensus in Science and…•1981

  • Mathematical models of dialogue 1

    Open Access•C L Hamblin•Theoria•1971

  • Knowledge in a Social World

    Alvin I Goldman•Knowledge in a Social World•1999

  • Destroying the consensus

    Open Access•Barry Loewer, Robert Laddaga•Synthese•1985

  • Consensus and the ideal observer

    Open Access•Keith Lehrer•Synthese•1985

  • Social consensus and rational agnoiology

    Open Access•Keith Lehrer•Synthese•1975

  • Simulating peer disagreements

    Open Access•Igor Douven•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2010

Unique citing works11
Citations per year0,73
Citation span2011 - 2026 (16)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae