Deliberative Exchange, Truth, and Cognitive Division of Labour
A Low-Resolution Modeling Approach
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7531979 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rainer Hegselmann (corresponding author), Ulrich Krause (0000-0001-8998-7646) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 130-144 |
| Publication date | 2009-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | EPISTÉMÈ (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1976-9660 • E-ISSN: 1750-0117 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3366/e1742360009000604 |
| OpenAlex | W2134040170 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 14 |
This paper develops a formal framework to model a process in which the formation of individual opinions is embedded in a deliberative exchange with others. The paper opts for a low-resolution modeling approach and abstracts away from most of the details of the social-epistemic process. Taking a bird's eye view allows us to analyze the chances for the truth to be found and broadly accepted under conditions of cognitive division of labour combined with a social exchange process. Cognitive division of labour means that only some individuals are active truth seekers, possibly with different capacities. Both mathematical tools and computer simulations are used to investigate the model. As an analytical result, the Funnel Theorem states that under rather weak conditions on the social process, a consensus on the truth will be reached if all individuals possess an arbitrarily small capacity to go for the truth. The Leading the pack Theorem states that under certain conditions even a single truth seeker may lead all individuals to the truth. Systematic simulations analyze how close agents can get to the truth depending upon the frequency of truth seekers, their capacities as truth seekers, the position of the truth (more to the extreme or more in the centre of an opinion space), and the willingness to take into account the opinions of others when exchanging and updating opinions
Cognition · Economics · Epistemology · Funnel · Ground truth · Political science · Position (finance · Process (computing · Resolution (logic · Seekers · Computer Science · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Philosophy · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Argumentation-induced rational issue polarisation
The Social Learnability of Natural Concepts
Coherence and Correspondence in the Network Dynamics of Belief Suites
Bounded Confidence Revisited
Argumentative landscapes
The ecological rationality of explanatory reasoning
Inference to the Best Explanation versus Bayes’s Rule in a Social Setting
Explaining the Success of Induction
Truth Approximation, Social Epistemology, and Opinion Dynamics
Anchoring in Deliberations
Network effects in a bounded confidence model
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,73 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2026 (16) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |