Problems in the Study of Migratory Loanwords in the Slavic Languages
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7532274 |
|---|---|
| Authors | George B Thomas (0000-0003-3421-8764, corresponding author), George Thomas (0000-0002-7192-7554) |
| Year | 1985 |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 307-325 |
| Publication date | 1985-09-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Slavonic Papers (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-5006 • E-ISSN: 2375-2475 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00085006.1985.11091809 |
| OpenAlex | W2007784398 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
Lexicology has long been regarded as the poor relation in Slavic linguistic scholarship.1 Since the Second World War, however, considerable progress has been registered, building on the pioneering work of Max Vasmer, Tadeusz Lehr-Splawinski, B. A. Larin, and others. Etymological dictionaries for almost all the Slavic languages are now either complete or in progress.2 The first fruits of the work on the proto-Slavic component in the Slavic languages are now beginning to appear.3 Much work has been carried out on the historical lexicology and lexicography of individual languages (most notably Czech, Slovak, Russian, Ukrainian, and Polish).4 Only lexical typology has been virtually ignored (apart from a seminal article by A. V. Isaoenko). 5 Particularly notable has been the series of
Czech · Etymology · Lexicography · Lexicology · Linguistics · Political science · Relation (database · Scholarship · Slavic languages · Slovak · Typology · Ukrainian · Computer Science · History · Language and Culture · Linguistics and language evolution · Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.05 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1986 - 1988 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |